Cresswell, Mark (2017) Truth and reconciliation in psychiatry: a response to Spandler and McKeown. Mental Health Review Journal, 22 (4). pp. 324-331. ISSN 1361-9322

Preview

PDF Cresswell_MHRJ_2017_Truth_and_reconciliation_in_psychiatry_a_response_to_Spandler_and_McKeown.pdf - Accepted Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial. Download (610kB) | Preview

Abstract

Purpose:- To critique Spandler and McKeown's recent advocacy of a Truth and Reconciliation process in psychiatry.
Approach:- A critique of a recent article in Mental Health Review Journal.
Findings:- That Spandler and McKeown's advocacy of a Truth and Reconciliation process in psychiatry can be criticised from a number of inter-related practical, political and ethical perspectives.
Value:- The present critique contributes to the ongoing debate about the desirability of a Truth and Reconciliation process in psychiatry.

Item Type:	Article
Identifier:	10.1108/MHRJ-09-2017-0041
Additional Information:	Cresswell, M. (2017), "Truth and reconciliation in psychiatry: a response to Spandler and McKeown", Mental Health Review Journal, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 324-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/MHRJ-09-2017-0041
Keywords:	forced psychiatry, truth and reconciliation, testimony, democracy
Subjects:	Law and criminal justice > Law Medicine and health > Mental health
Depositing User:	Jisc Router
Date Deposited:	17 Apr 2019 16:32
Last Modified:	04 Nov 2024 11:51
URI:	https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/6603

Downloads

Actions (login required)

View Item