Benefits and drawbacks of double-blind peer review. (n.d.). Retrieved 27 January 2019, from https://www.exordo.com/blog/double-blind-peer-review/
BMJ. (n.d.). The peer review process. Retrieved 27 January 2019, from https://authors.bmj.com/after-submitting/peer-review-process/
Cohen, J. (2013, May 20). What Privacy is For. Retrieved 25 January 2019, from https://harvardlawreview.org/2013/05/what-privacy-is-for/
Differential Privacy. (n.d.). Retrieved 22 January 2019, from https://privacytools.seas.harvard.edu/differential-privacy
Erlich, Y., Williams, J. B., Glazer, D., Yocum, K., Farahany, N., Olson, M., … Kain, R. C. (2014). Redefining Genomic Privacy: Trust and Empowerment. PLOS Biology, 12(11), e1001983. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001983
Gajda, A. (2016). Academic Freedom, the Presumption of Openness, and Privacy. Revue Internationale Des Gouvernements Ouverts, 2(0), 151–164. Retrieved from http://ojs.imodev.org/index.php/RIGO/article/view/14
Kuehn, B. M. (2017). Rooting out bias. ELife, 6, e32014. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.32014
Makula, A. (2017). “Is it like academia.edu?”: Faculty perceptions and usage of academic social networking sites and implications for librarians and institutional repositories. Journal of New Librarianship, 2(1), 2479. https://doi.org/10.21173/newlibs/2/1
P, C. (2016, June 3). Social media and the student experience — a reflection on open communication in Higher Education. Retrieved 25 January 2019, from https://medium.com/open-knowledge-in-he/social-media-and-the-student-experience-a-reflection-on-open-communication-in-higher-education-84a871e659f1
Richards, N. (2015, January 7). How encryption protects our intellectual privacy (and why you should care). Wired UK. Retrieved from https://www.wired.co.uk/article/encryption-intellectual-privacy
Ross-Hellauer, T. (2017). What is open peer review? A systematic review. F1000Research, 6, 588. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.11369.2
The Royal Society. (2012). Science as an open enterprise (Summary), 10. Retrieved from https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-saoe-summary.pdf
Sanders, K. (n.d.). Bag of onions: growing bulbs of intellectual freedom from academic libraries. Retrieved 27 January 2019, from https://uwlopenaccess.edublogs.org/2018/03/05/bag-of-onions-ggrowing-bulbs-of-intellectual-freedom-from-academic-libraries/
Shore, P. (2017, August 30). Open Science — can we be too open? Retrieved 25 January 2019, from https://medium.com/open-knowledge-in-he/open-science-can-we-be-too-open-bc4f15aebf57
Single-Blind Vs. Double-Blind Peer Review. (2018, February 13). Retrieved 27 January 2019, from https://www.enago.com/academy/double-blind-peer-review-for-better-or-for-worse/
Vayena, E., & Gasser, U. (2016). Between Openness and Privacy in Genomics. PLOS Medicine, 13(1), e1001937. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001937
Wellcome. (2017). Policy on data, software and materials management and sharing. Retrieved 26 January 2019, from https://wellcome.ac.uk/funding/guidance/policy-data-software-materials-management-and-sharing
Wellcome. (n.d). Developing an outputs management plan. Retrieved 26 January 2019, from https://wellcome.ac.uk/funding/guidance/developing-outputs-management-plan
Weller, M. (2016, January 11). Advantages & disadvantages of openness. Retrieved 25 January 2019, from https://medium.com/open-knowledge-in-he/advantages-disadvantages-of-openness-bb9790c06c1b#.1nbb95i8e
Lists
Lists
