Theorising dementia as a risk classification: sociotechnical imaginaries of safety and order in acute hospital care of people living with dementia

Mwale, Shadreck ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5773-8458, Northcott, Andy ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3030-9861 and Featherstone, Katie (2026) Theorising dementia as a risk classification: sociotechnical imaginaries of safety and order in acute hospital care of people living with dementia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (IJERPH), 23 (11).

[thumbnail of MwaleS NothcottA FeatherstoneK_ Theorising Dementia as a Risk Classification_ VoR.pdf]
Preview
PDF
MwaleS NothcottA FeatherstoneK_ Theorising Dementia as a Risk Classification_ VoR.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (395kB) | Preview

Abstract

People living with dementia are one of the populations most at risk of restrictive intervention during an acute hospital admission. These restrictive interventions are typically justified by staff concerns about patient safety and as a means of mitigating against falls, itself a key metric of quality care in acute settings. Drawing on Jasanoff and Kim’s concept of sociotechnical imaginaries, this paper explores how healthcare professionals imagine risk and safety, and how these imaginaries contour the use of restrictive practice. Data collection comprised 225 days of ethnographic observation and 1168 in situ interviews with patients, families, and ward staff at (n = 6) NHS Trusts working in (n = 3) dyads for acute and mental health care across England. Data were analysed thematically using NVivo. Findings were grouped into three major themes: institutional cultures, institutional anxiety, and atrocity stories. The study reveals tensions between ways in which people living with dementia respond to admissions and the institutional imaginaries of a safe, risk-free ward, alongside expectations of “good patienthood.” It argues that these imaginaries produce dementia as a risk classification, where bed or bedside-bound patients who do not demand staff attention inform the routine use of restrictive practices. These interventions, however, often result in distress and feelings of imprisonment among people living with dementia, which in turn prompts further tightening of restraints on this vulnerable population.

Item Type: Article
Identifier: 10.3390/ijerph23111363
Keywords: dementia; restraint; restrictive practice; risk; ethnography
Subjects: Medicine and health > Clinical medicine > Dementia
Medicine and health > Clinical medicine > Clinical care
Date Deposited: 28 Oct 2026
Dates:
Date
Publication status
23 October 2026
Accepted
27 October 2026
Published
School, department or research centre: School of Medicine and Biosciences
The Geller Institute of Ageing and Memory
Keywords: dementia; restraint; restrictive practice; risk; ethnography
URI: https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/15675

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (admin access)

View Item

Menu