What is the evidence that medical procedures which induce coughing or involve respiratory suctioning are associated with increased generation of aerosols and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection? A rapid systematic review

Wilson, Jennie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4713-9662 (2021) What is the evidence that medical procedures which induce coughing or involve respiratory suctioning are associated with increased generation of aerosols and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection? A rapid systematic review. Journal of Hospital Infection. ISSN 0195-6701 (In Press)

[img] PDF
JHI-D-21-00608_R1 (1).pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 July 2022.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (7MB) | Request a copy

Abstract

The risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from aerosols generated by medical procedures is a cause for concern. This rapid systematic review aimed to evaluate the evidence for aerosol production and transmission of respiratory infection associated with procedures that involve airway suctioning or induce coughing/sneezing. The review was informed by PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in PubMed for studies published between 1/1/2003 and 6/10/2020. Included studies examined whether nasogastric tube insertion, lung-function tests, nasoendoscopy, dysphagia assessment or suctioning for airway clearance result in aerosol generation or transmission of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS, or influenza. Risk of bias assessment assessed robustness of measurement, control for confounding and applicability to clinical practice. Eighteen primary studies and two systematic reviews were included. Three epidemiological studies found no association between nasogastric tube insertion and acquisition of respiratory infections. One simulation study found low/very low production of associated with pulmonary lung function tests. Seven simulation studies of endoscopic sinus surgery suggested significant increases in aerosols but findings were inconsistent, two clinical studies found airborne particles associated with the use of drills. Some simulation studies did not use robust measures to detect particles and are difficult to equate to clinical conditions. There was an absence of evidence to suggest that the procedures included in the review were associated with an increased risk of transmission of respiratory infection. In order to better target precautions to mitigate risk, more research is required to determine the characteristics of medical procedures and patients that increase the risk of transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: aerosol generating procedure, respiratory infection, SARS-CoV-2, rapid systematic review, aerobiology, epidemiology, cough, suction, nasoendoscopy, nasogastric tube, lung function test
Subjects: Medicine and health > Health promotion and public health
Medicine and health > Health promotion and public health > Infection prevention
Medicine and health > Microbiology
Medicine and health > Clinical medicine
Medicine and health
Medicine and health > Nursing
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Jennie Wilson
Date Deposited: 02 Jul 2021 13:08
Last Modified: 05 Jul 2021 12:54
URI: http://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/8044

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Menu