Curran, Evonne T., Wilson, Jennie ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4713-9662, Haig, Caroline E., McCowan, Colin, Leonard, Alistair and Loveday, Heather 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2259-8149
  
(2016)
The Where is Norovirus Control Lost (WINCL) study: an enhanced surveillance project to identify norovirus index cases in care settings in the UK and Ireland.
    Journal of Infection Prevention, 17 (1).
     pp. 8-14.
     ISSN 1757-1774
  
  
  
| ![Journal of Infection Prevention-2015-Curran-1757177415613133.pdf [thumbnail of Journal of Infection Prevention-2015-Curran-1757177415613133.pdf]](https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) | PDF Journal of Infection Prevention-2015-Curran-1757177415613133.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB) | Request a copy | 
Abstract
Background: Norovirus outbreaks have a significant impact on all care settings; little is known about the index cases
from whom these outbreaks initiate.
Aim: To identify and categorise norovirus outbreak index cases in care settings.
Methods: A mixed-methods, multi-centre, prospective, enhanced surveillance study identified and categorised index
cases in acute and non-acute care settings.
Results: From 54 participating centres, 537 outbreaks were reported (November 2013 to April 2014): 383 (71.3%) in
acute care facilities (ACF); 115 (21.4%) in residential or care homes (RCH) and 39 (7.3%) in other care settings (OCS).
Index cases were identified in 424 (79%) outbreaks. Of the 245 index cases who were asymptomatic on admission and not
transferred within/into the care setting, 123 (50%) had been an inpatient/resident for 4 days. Four themes emerged: missing
the diagnosis, care service under pressure, delay in outbreak control measures and patient/resident location and proximity.
Conclusion: The true index case is commonly not identified as the cause of a norovirus outbreak with at least 50%
of index cases being misclassified. Unrecognised norovirus cross-transmission occurs frequently suggesting that either
Standard Infection Control Precautions (SICPs) are being insufficiently well applied, and or SICPs are themselves are
insufficient to prevent outbreaks.
| Item Type: | Article | 
|---|---|
| Identifier: | 10.1177/1757177415613133 | 
| Subjects: | Medicine and health > Microbiology Medicine and health > Nursing | 
| Related URLs: | |
| Date Deposited: | 02 Jun 2016 | 
| URI: | https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1704 | 
Actions (login required)
|  | View Item | 
 Lists
 Lists Lists
 Lists