1. E-QUAL Enhancing Quality, A.a.G.o.U.E.i.I. 2017; Available from: http://www.projectequal.net/equal/index.php.
2. Webb, M., et al. Assessment for Blended Learning Scenarios: A Decision Support Tool. 2017. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
3. Anderson, L.W., D.R. Krathwohl, and B.S. Bloom, A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. 2001: Longman.
4. Webb, M.E., D.C. Gibson, and A. Forkosh-Baruch, Challenges for information technology supporting educational assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2013. 29(5): p. 451-462.
5. Assessment Reform Group, A., Assessment for Learning: 10 Principles. 2002.
6. Zheng, Q., L. Chen, and D. Burgos, The International Comparison and Trend Analysis of the Development of MOOCs in Higher Education, in The Development of MOOCs in China. 2018, Springer Singapore: Singapore. p. 1-9.
7. Butler, R., Enhancing and undermining intrinsic motivation; the effects of task-involving and ego-involving evaluation on interest and performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1988. 58: p. 1-14.
8. Giles, T., S. Gilbert, and L. McNeill, Do students want and need written feedback on summative assignments. Engaging students with the feedback process: A topic review activity. ergo: The Journal of the Education Research Group of Adelaide, 2013. 3(1): p. 15-21.
9. Douglas, T., et al., The feedback process: Perspectives of first and second year undergraduate students in the disciplines of education, health science and nursing. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2016. 13(1): p. 3.
10. Sadler, D.R., Beyond feedback: developing student capability in complex appraisal. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2010. 35(5): p. 535 - 550.
11. Black, P., et al., Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. 2003, Buckingham, UK: Open University.
12. Liu, N.-F. and D. Carless, Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 2006. 11(3): p. 279-290.
13. Webb, M.E., Beginning teacher education and collaborative formative e-assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 2010. 35(5): p. 597 - 618.
14. Black, P., Formative assessment – an optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2015. 22(1): p. 161-177.
15. Grau, V. and D. Whitebread, Self and social regulation of learning during collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 2012. 22(6): p. 401-412.
16. Li, H., et al., Peer assessment in the digital age: a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher ratings. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2016. 41(2): p. 245-264.
17. Yeh, S.S., Understanding and addressing the achievement gap through individualized instruction and formative assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 2010. 17(2): p. 169-182.
18. Clarke, J. and C. Dede, Assessment, technology, and change. Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 2010. 42(3): p. 309-328.
19. Gibson, D., C. Aldrich, and M. Prensky, Games and Simulations in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks. 2007, Information Science Publishing: Hershey, Pennsylvania.
20. Ridgway, J., S. McCusker, and D. Pead, Literature review of e-assessment. 2004: Futurelab.
21. Hatzipanagos, S. and S. Warburton, Feedback as dialogue: Exploring the links between formative assessment and social software in distance learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 2009. 34(1): p. 45-59.
22. Guri-Rosenblit, S., ‘Distance education’and ‘e-learning’: Not the same thing. Higher Education, 2005. 49(4): p. 467-493.
23. Bloom, B.S., et al., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals - Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. 1956, New York: McKay.
24. Anderson, L.W., Objectives, evaluation, and the improvement of education. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 2005. 31(2–3): p. 102-113.