Learning HCI across institutions, disciplines and countries: a field study of cognitive styles in analytical and creative tasks

Lists

Abdelnour-Nocera, Jose ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7935-7368, Clemmensen, Torkil and Guimaraes, Tatiane (2017) Learning HCI across institutions, disciplines and countries: a field study of cognitive styles in analytical and creative tasks. In: INTERACT 2017 - The 16th IFIP TC.13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 25-29 Sep 2017, Mumbai, India.

[thumbnail of HCI Education Abdelnour Clemmensen Guimaraes Camera Ready.pdf]

Preview

PDF
HCI Education Abdelnour Clemmensen Guimaraes Camera Ready.pdf - Accepted Version
Download (324kB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0_13

Abstract

Human-computer interaction (HCI) is increasingly becoming a subject taught in universities around the world. However, little is known of the interactions of the HCI curriculum with students in different types of institutions and disciplines internationally. In order to explore these interactions, we studied the performance of HCI students in design, technology and business faculties in universities in UK, India, Namibia, Mexico and China who participated in a common set of design and evaluation tasks. We obtained participants’ cognitive style profiles based on Allinson and Hayes scale in order to gain further insights into their learning styles and explore any relation between these and performance. We found participants’ cognitive style preferences to be predominantly in the adaptive range, i.e. with combined analytical and intuitive traits, compared to normative data for software engineering, psychology and design professionals. We further identified significant relations between students’ cognitive styles and performance in analytical and creative tasks of a HCI professional individual. We discuss the findings in the context of the distinct backgrounds of the students and universities that participated in this study and the value of research that explores and promotes diversity in HCI education.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
ISSN:	0302-9743
ISBN:	9783319680583
Identifier:	10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0_13
Page Range:	pp. 198-217
Identifier:	10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0_13
Additional Information:	© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017. The final publication is part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10516) and is available at Springer via https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-68059-0_13
Keywords:	culture, HCI Education, Cognitive Styles, Design, Evaluation
Subjects:	Education Computing > Innovation and user experience > Global software Computing > Innovation and user experience Computing > Innovation and user experience > Usability
Depositing User:	Jose Abdelnour-Nocera
Date Deposited:	03 Oct 2017 10:53
Last Modified:	04 Nov 2024 12:50
URI:	https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/3974

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item

References

1. Gross, T.: Human-Computer Interaction Education and Diversity. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools: 16th International Conference, HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014, Proceedings, Part I. pp. 187–198. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014).
2. Clemmensen, T., Nørbjerg, J.: Separation in theory, coordination in practice – teaching HCI and SE. Softw. Process Improv. Pract. 8, 99–110 (2003).
3. Gasparini, I., Salgado, L.C. de C., Pereira, R.: The Brazilian HCI Community Perspectives in Cultural Aspects in HCI. In: Rau, P.-L.P. (ed.) Cross-Cultural Design: 8th International Conference, CCD 2016, Held as Part of HCI International 2016, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17-22, 2016, Proceedings. pp. 53–62. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016).
4. Yammiyavar, P.: Status of HCI and Usability Research in Indian Educational Institutions. In: Katre, D., Orngreen, R., Yammiyavar, P., and Clemmensen, T. (eds.) Human Work Interaction Design: Usability in Social, Cultural and Organizational Contexts: Second IFIP WG 13.6 Conference, HWID 2009, Pune, India, October 7-8, 2009, Revised Selected Papers. pp. 21–27. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010).
5. Zhang, L.-F.: Revisiting the predictive power of thinking styles for academic performance. J. Psychol. 138, 351–370 (2004).
6. Cruz, S., da Silva, F.Q., Capretz, L.F.: Forty years of research on personality in software engineering: A mapping study. Comput. Hum. Behav. 46, 94–113 (2015).
7. Moore, S., O’Maidin, D., McElligott, A.: Cognitive styles among computer systems students: Preliminary findings. J. Comput. High. Educ. 14, 45–67 (2003).
8. Carter, L., Jernejcic, L., Lim, N.: Success in CS: Is culture a factor? In: 2007 37th Annual Frontiers In Education Conference - Global Engineering: Knowledge Without Borders, Opportunities Without Passports. p. T3A–16–T3A–21 (2007).
9. Churchill, E.F., Bowser, A., Preece, J.: The Future of HCI Education: A Flexible, Global, Living Curriculum. interactions. 23, 70–73 (2016).
10. Collazos, C.A., Granollers, T., Gil, R., Guerrero, L.A., Ochoa, S.F.: Multicultural aspects in HCI-curricula. Innov. Creat. Educ. 2, 1584–1587 (2010).
11. Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Michaelides, M., Austin, A., Modi, S.: A Cross-national Study of HCI Education Experience and Representation. In: HCI International 2013 (2013).
12. Douglas, I., Liu, Z. eds: Global Usability. Springer London, London (2011).
13. Sari, E., Wadhwa, B.: Understanding HCI Education Across Asia-Pacific. In: Proceedings of the ASEAN CHI Symposium’15. pp. 36–41. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2015).
14. Boscarioli, C., Silveira, M.S., Prates, R.O., Bim, S.A., Barbosa, S.D.J.: Charting the Landscape of HCI Education in Brazil. In: Human-Computer Interaction. Theories, Methods, and Tools - 16th International Conference, HCI International 2014, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, June 22-27, 2014, Proceedings, Part I. pp. 177–186 (2014).
15. de Souza, C.S., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Prates, R.O., Pimenta, M.S.: HCI in Brazil: Lessons Learned and New Perspectives. In: Proceedings of the VIII Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 358–359. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, Porto Alegre, Brazil, Brazil (2008).
16. Prates, R.O., Filgueiras, L.V.L.: Usability in Brazil. In: Douglas, I. and Liu, Z. (eds.) Global Usability. pp. 91–109. Springer London, London (2011).
17. Liu, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Chen, J.: Usability in China. In: Global usability. pp. 111–135. Springer (2011).
18. Calderon, M.: Teaching human computer interaction: First experiences. CLEI Electron. J. 12, 1–9 (2009).
19. Joshi, A., Gupta, S.: Usability in India. In: Douglas, I. and Liu, Z. (eds.) Global Usability. pp. 153–168. Springer London, London (2011).
20. Rocha, M.A.M.: Usability in Mexico. In: Douglas, I. and Liu, Z. (eds.) Global Usability. pp. 223–236. Springer London, London (2011).
21. Winschiers, H.: The challenges of participatory design in a intercultural context: designing for usability in namibia. In: PDC. pp. 73–76 (2006).
22. Sharkey, E. and Paynter, J. (2004). CHI education in New Zealand. Bulletin of Applied Computing and Information Technology, 2(3)., http://www.naccq.ac.nz/bacit/0203/2004Sharkey_CHINZ.htm.
23. Pribeanu, C., Chisǎliţǎ, C.: A Historical Perspective of HCI Development in Romania. In: CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1023–1024. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2004).
24. Kotzé, P.: Directions in HCI Education, Research, and Practice in Southern Africa. In: CHI ’02 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 524–525. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2002).
25. Oestreicher, L., Gulliksen, J.: HCI education in Sweden. SIGCHI Bull. 31, (1999).
26. Day, J., Foley, J.: Evaluating Web Lectures: A Case Study from HCI. In: CHI ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 195–200. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2006).
27. Nisbett, R.E., Miyamoto, Y.: The influence of culture: holistic versus analytic perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9, 467–473 (2005).
28. Hayes, J., Allinson, C.W.: Cultural Differences in the Learning Styles of Managers. Manag. Int. Rev. 28, 75–80 (1988).
29. Hofstede, G.: Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Mc Graw-Hill, Berkshire,UK (1991).
30. Honey, P., Mumford, A.: 7 Styles of learning. Gower Handb. Manag. Dev. 101 (1994).
31. Allinson, C.W., Hayes, J.: The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. J. Manag. Stud. 33, 119–135 (1996).
32. Hodgkinson, G.P., Sadler-Smith, E.: Complex or unitary? A critique and empirical re-assessment of the Allinson-Hayes Cognitive Style Index. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 76, 243–268 (2003).
33. McElroy, J.C., Hendrickson, A.R., Townsend, A.M., DeMarie, S.M.: Dispositional factors in internet use: personality versus cognitive style. MIS Q. 809–820 (2007).
34. Evans, C., Cools, E., Charlesworth, Z.M.: Learning in higher education–how cognitive and learning styles matter. Teach. High. Educ. 15, 467–478 (2010).
35. Cools, E., Armstrong, S.J., Verbrigghe, J.: Methodological practices in cognitive style research: Insights and recommendations from the field of business and psychology. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 23, 627–641 (2014).
36. Allinson, C., Hayes, J.: The cognitive style index: Technical manual and user guide. Retrieved January. 13, 2014 (2012).
37. Park, Y., Black, J.B.: Identifying the impact of domain knowledge and cognitive style on web-based information search behavior. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 36, 15–37 (2007).
38. Armstrong, S., Allinson, C.W., Hayes, J.: The implications of cognitive style for the management of student-supervisor relationships. Educ. Psychol. 17, 209–217 (1997).
39. Bishop-Clark, C.: Cognitive style, personality, and computer programming. Comput. Hum. Behav. 11, 241–260 (1995).
40. Capretz, L.F.: Personality types in software engineering. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 58, 207–214 (2003).
41. Capretz, L.F., Ahmed, F.: Why do we need personality diversity in software engineering? ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes. 35, 1–11 (2010).
42. Clemmensen, T., Hertzum, M., Hornbæk, K., Shi, Q., Yammiyavar, P.: Cultural cognition in usability evaluation. Interact. Comput. 21, 212–220 (2009).
43. Nisbett, R.E., Peng, K., Choi, I., Norenzayan, A.: Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychol. Rev. 108, 291 (2001).
44. Bennett, S.: Creative thinking: Do creative people have distinctive cognitive styles?, (2010).
45. Papavero, E.: Software engineers in China and the US: A comparison of cognitive styles. Presented at the American Psychological Association Convention (2005).
46. Frampton, K., Thom, J.A., Carroll, J., Crossman, B.: Information Technology Architects: Approaching the Longer View. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMIS CPR Conference on Computer Personnel Research: Forty Four Years of Computer Personnel Research: Achievements, Challenges &Amp; the Future. pp. 221–229. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2006).
47. Corbett, A.C.: Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. J. Bus. Ventur. 22, 97–118 (2007).
48. Castro, L.A., Gonzalez, V.M.: Hometown Websites: Continuous Maintenance of Cross-border Connections. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies. pp. 145–154. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2009).
49. Cooper, A.: The Inmates are Running the Asylum–Why High-Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How 2 to Restore the Sanity. (1999).
50. Austin, A., Abdelnour Nocera, J.: So, Who Exactly IS The HCI Professional? In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. pp. 1037–1042. ACM (2015).
51. Vermunt, J.D., Vermetten, Y.J.: Patterns in Student Learning: Relationships Between Learning Strategies, Conceptions of Learning, and Learning Orientations. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 16, 359–384 (2004).
52. Copeland, L., Griggs, L.: Getting the best from foreign employees. Manage. Rev. 75, 19–26 (1986).
53. Winschiers-Theophilus, H.: Cultural appropriation of software design and evaluation. In: Handbook of Research on Socio-technical Design and Social Networking Systems. pp. 699–710. IGI Global (2009).
54. Oyugi, C., Abdelnour-Nocera, J., Clemmensen, T.: Harambee: a novel usability evaluation method for low-end users in Kenya. In: Proceedings of the 8th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Fun, Fast, Foundational. pp. 179–188. ACM (2014).
55. Winschiers-Theophilus, H., Bidwell, N.J.: Toward an Afro-Centric Indigenous HCI Paradigm. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 29, 243–255 (2013).
56. Lazem, S.: A Case Study for Sensitising Egyptian Engineering Students to User-Experience in Technology Design. In: Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on Computing for Development. p. 12:1–12:10. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2016).
57. Jordan, Z., Nocera, J.A., Peters, A., Dray, S., Kimani, S.: A Living HCI Curriculum. In: Proceedings of the First African Conference on Human Computer Interaction. pp. 229–232. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2016).

Tools

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

The University of West London

Learning HCI across institutions, disciplines and countries: a field study of cognitive styles in analytical and creative tasks

Abstract

Downloads

Actions (login required)

Menu