Wealth, income and dementia in Germany: longitudinal findings from a representative survey among the oldest old

Hajek, Andre; Konig, Hans-Helmut; Rafnsson, Snorri; Gyasi, Razak M.

Wealth, income and dementia in Germany: longitudinal findings from a representative survey among the oldest old

Lists

Hajek, Andre, Konig, Hans-Helmut, Rafnsson, Snorri ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7985-912X and Gyasi, Razak M. (2025) Wealth, income and dementia in Germany: longitudinal findings from a representative survey among the oldest old. BMC Public Health (25).

PDF (PDF/A)
Wealth, income and dementia in Germany_RafnassonS_accessible.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB)

Official URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12889-0...

Abstract

Background: There is limited knowledge on the link between wealth, as well as income, and dementia risk among the oldest old (80 years and over). The purpose of our study was to examine the association between income, wealth, and dementia among the oldest old in Germany.

Methods: We used representative longitudinal data from a survey, which aimed to assess the quality of life and subjective well-being of individuals aged 80 years and above in North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany). The length of follow-up was approximately 2 years. The sample consisted of both community-dwelling and institutionalized individuals, with a total of 943 observations included in the analysis. The average age of the participants was 86.0 years (SD: 4.0 years). Probable dementia was assessed by DemTect, a widely accepted screening instrument. Common income and wealth categories were used to quantify these variables.

Results: After adjusting for sociodemographic and health variables, logistic random effects regressions showed that greater wealth was associated with a lower likelihood of probable dementia (second lowest wealth quartile compared to lowest wealth quartile: OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.07-0.76; second highest wealth quartile: OR: 0.05, 95% CI: 0.01-0.31; highest wealth quartile: OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02-0.91). In contrast, income was not significantly associated with the likelihood of probable dementia.

Conclusion: Our study showed a link between wealth and dementia. Such knowledge can enrich poverty and inequality research within this field. More specifically, our findings lend support to evidence-based policies aiming to decrease the burden of dementia in later life through reduction in economic inequalities and better income distribution.

Item Type:	Article
Identifier:	10.1186/s12889-025-24239-1
Keywords:	Aged, 80 and over, Dementia, Wealth, Asset, Income
Subjects:	Medicine and health > Clinical medicine > Dementia
Date Deposited:	25 Sep 2025 13:03
Last Modified:	25 Sep 2025 13:15
URI:	https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/14108

Actions (login required)

View Item

References

1. Cao Q, Tan C-C, Xu W, Hu H, Cao X-P, Dong Q, et al. The prevalence of
dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Alzheimers Dis.
2020;73(3):1157–66.
2. Shen C, Rolls ET, Cheng W, Kang J, Dong G, Xie C, et al. Associations of social
isolation and loneliness with later dementia. Neurology. 2022;99(2):e164–75.
3. Leicht H, Heinrich S, Heider D, Bachmann C, Bickel H, van den Bussche
H, et al. Net costs of dementia by disease stage. Acta Psychiatr Scand.
2011;124(5):384–95.
4. Hajek A, Brettschneider C, Ernst A, Posselt T, Wiese B, Prokein J, et al. Longitudinal
predictors of informal and formal caregiving time in community-dwelling
dementia patients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016;51:607–16.
5. July J, Pranata R. Prevalence of dementia and its impact on mortality in
patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2021;21(2):172–7.
6. Wimo A, Seeher K, Cataldi R, Cyhlarova E, Dielemann JL, Frisell O et al.
The worldwide costs of dementia in 2019. Alzheimer’s & Dementia.
2023;19(7):2865–73.
7. Geraets AFJ, Leist AK. Sex/gender and socioeconomic differences in modifiable
risk factors for dementia. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):80.
8. Cadar D, Lassale C, Davies H, Llewellyn DJ, Batty GD, Steptoe A. Individual and
area-based socioeconomic factors associated with dementia incidence in
England: evidence from a 12-year follow-up in the English longitudinal study
of ageing. JAMA Psychiatr. 2018;75(7):723–32.
9. Deckers K, Cadar D, van Boxtel MP, Verhey FR, Steptoe A, Köhler S. Modifiable
risk factors explain socioeconomic inequalities in dementia risk: evidence
from a population-based prospective cohort study. J Alzheimers Dis.
2019;71(2):549–57.
10. Weiss J, Puterman E, Prather AA, Ware EB, Rehkopf DH. A data-driven prospective
study of dementia among older adults in the United States. PLoS One.
2020;15(10):e0239994.
11. Samuel LJ, Szanton SL, Wolff JL, Ornstein KA, Parker LJ, Gitlin LN. Socioeconomic
disparities in six-year incident dementia in a nationally representative
cohort of US older adults: an examination of financial resources. BMC Geriatr.
2020;20:1–9.

12. Yaffe K, Falvey C, Harris TB, Newman A, Satterfield S, Koster A, et al. Effect of
socioeconomic disparities on incidence of dementia among biracial older
adults: prospective study. BMJ. 2013.
13. Wang AY, Hu HY, Ou YN, Wang ZT, Ma YH, Tan L, et al. Socioeconomic
status and risks of cognitive impairment and dementia: a systematic
review and meta-analysis of 39 prospective studies. J Prev Alzheimers Dis.
2023;10(1):83–94.
14. Bodryzlova Y, Kim A, Michaud X, André C, Bélanger E, Moullec G. Social class
and the risk of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the
prospective longitudinal studies. Scand J Public Health. 2022.
15. Burton WN, Schultz A, Edington DW. Health and wealth: the importance for
lifestyle medicine. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021;15(4):407–12.
16. Meng X, D’arcy C. Education and dementia in the context of the cognitive
reserve hypothesis: a systematic review with meta-analyses and qualitative
analyses. PLoS One. 2012;7(6): e38268.
17. Marin M-F, Lord C, Andrews J, Juster R-P, Sindi S, Arsenault-Lapierre G, et al.
Chronic stress, cognitive functioning and mental health. Neurobiol Learn
Mem. 2011;96(4):583–95.
18. McEwen BS. Neurobiological and systemic effects of chronic stress. Chronic
Stress. 2017;1: 2470547017692328.
19. Willingham DT. Ask the cognitive scientist: why does family wealth affect
learning?? Am Educ. 2012;36(1):33–9.
20. Cavalli S, Bickel J-F. Exclusion in very old age: the impact of three critical life
events. Int J Ageing Later Life. 2007;2(1):9–31.
21. Hajek A, König HH. Determinants of psychosocial factors among the oldest
old–evidence from the representative survey on quality of life and subjective
well-being of the very old in North Rhine‐Westphalia (NRW80+). Int J Geriatr
Psychiatry. 2022.
22. Streeter JL. Gender differences in widowhood in the short-run and long-run:
financial, emotional, and mental wellbeing. J Econ Aging. 2020;17: 100258.
23. Pabst A, Bär J, Röhr S, Löbner M, Kleineidam L, Heser K, et al. Do self-reported
hearing and visual impairments predict longitudinal dementia in older
adults? J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(6):1519–28.
24. Wagner M, Rietz C, Kaspar R, Janhsen A, Geithner L, Neise M, et al. Quality
of life of the very old. Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie.
2018;51(2):193–9.
25. Kalbe E, Brand M, Kessler J, Calabrese P. Der demtect in der klinischen
anwendung: sensitivität und spezifität eines kognitiven screeninginstruments.
Z Für Gerontopsychologie &-psychiatrie. 2005;18(3):121–30.
26. Kessler J, Fengler S, Kaesberg S, Müller K, Calabrese P, Ellwein T, et al. DemTect
40–und demtect 80+: neue auswertungsroutinen für diese altersgruppen.
Fortschr Der Neurologie· Psychiatrie. 2014;82(11):640–5.
27. Kalbe E, Kessler J. DemTect. In: Larner AJ, editor. Cognitive screening instruments:
A practical approach. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017.
pp. 197–208.
28. Hajek A, König H-H. Wealth and psychosocial factors among middle-aged
and older adults. Findings based on nationally representative data. Arch
Gerontol Geriatr. 2022;103: 104777.
29. Hajek A, Kretzler B, Riedel-Heller SG, König H-H. Frequency and correlates of
mild cognitive impairment and dementia among the oldest old–evidence
from the representative survey on quality of life and subjective well-being
of the very old in North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW80+). Arch Gerontol Geriatr.
2023;104: 104804.
30. Spector A, Orrell M. Using a biopsychosocial model of dementia as a tool to
guide clinical practice. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22(6):957–65.
31. Fratiglioni L, Marseglia A, Dekhtyar S. Ageing without dementia: can stimulating
psychosocial and lifestyle experiences make a difference? Lancet Neurol.
2020;19(6):533–43.
32. UNESCO. International standard classification of education. ISCED 1997. Reedition
ed. Paris: UNESCO; 2006.
33. Heidenblut S, Zank S. Entwicklung eines Neuen depressionsscreenings
für Den einsatz in der geriatrie. Zeitschrift Für Gerontologie Und Geriatrie.
2010;43(3):170–6.
34. Heidenblut S, Zank S. Screening for depression with the depression in old
age scale (DIA-S) and the geriatric depression scale (GDS15): diagnostic
accuracy in a geriatric inpatient setting. GeroPsych. 2014;27(1):41–9.
35. Cameron AC, Trivedi PK. Microeconometrics: methods and applications. New
York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
36. Fratiglioni L, Wang H-X. Brain reserve hypothesis in dementia. J Alzheimers
Dis. 2007;12(1):11–22.
37. Satz P. Brain reserve capacity on symptom onset after brain injury: a
formulation and review of evidence for threshold theory. Neuropsychology.
1993;7(3):273.
38. Yates LA, Ziser S, Spector A, Orrell M. Cognitive leisure activities and future risk
of cognitive impairment and dementia: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016;28(11):1791–806.
39. Bobrow K, Hoang T, Barnes DE, Gardner RC, Allen IE, Yaffe K. The effect of sex
and wealth on population attributable risk factors for dementia in South
Africa. Front Neurol. 2021;12:766705.
40. Lourida I, Hannon E, Littlejohns TJ, Langa KM, Hyppönen E, Kuźma E, et al.
Association of lifestyle and genetic risk with incidence of dementia. JAMA.
2019;322(5):430–7.
41. Röhr S, Pabst A, Baber R, Engel C, Glaesmer H, Hinz A, et al. Socioeconomic
inequalities in cognitive functioning only to a small extent attributable to
modifiable health and lifestyle factors in individuals without dementia. J
Alzheimers Dis. 2022;90:1523–34.
42. Tough H, Siegrist J, Fekete C. Social relationships, mental health and
wellbeing in physical disability: a systematic review. BMC Public Health.
2017;17(1):414.
43. Glei DA, Lee C, Weinstein M. Income, wealth, and black-white disparities in
cognition. Soc Sci Med. 2022;310: 115298.
44. Killewald A, Pfeffer FT, Schachner JN. Wealth inequality and accumulation.
Ann Rev Sociol. 2017;43(1):379–404.
45. Byun H, Chung JH, Lee SH, Kim EM, Kim I. Dementia in a hearing-impaired
population according to hearing aid use: a nationwide population-based
study in Korea. Ear Hear. 2022;43(6):1661.
46. Angel S, Disslbacher F, Humer S, Schnetzer M. What did you really earn last
year? : Explaining measurement error in survey income data. J Royal Stat Soc
Ser A: Stat Soc. 2019;182(4):1411–37.

Tools

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

The University of West London

Wealth, income and dementia in Germany: longitudinal findings from a representative survey among the oldest old

Abstract

Actions (login required)

Menu