Feasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-professional,a training and support intervention for homecare workers caring for clients living with dementia:a cluster-randomised feasibility trial

Cooper, Claudia, Zabihi, Sedigheh, Akhtar, Amirah, Lee, Teresa, Isaaq, Abdinasir, Le Novere, Marie, Barber, Julie, Lord, Kathryn, Rapaport, Penny, Banks, Sara, Duggan, Sandra, Ogden, Margaret, Walters, Kate, Orgeta, Vasiliki, Rockwood, Kenneth, Butler, Laurie T, Manthorpe, Jill, Dow, Briony, Hoe, Juanita ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4647-8950, Hunter, Rachael, Banerjee, Sube, Budgett, Jessica and Duffy, Larisa (2024) Feasibility and acceptability of NIDUS-professional,a training and support intervention for homecare workers caring for clients living with dementia:a cluster-randomised feasibility trial. Age & Ageing, 53 (4). ISSN 0002-0729

[thumbnail of pdf/a]
Preview
PDF (pdf/a)
Cooper et al., 2024_Age&Ageing (1).pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (620kB) | Preview

Abstract

Introduction: In the first randomised controlled trial of a dementia training and support intervention in UK homecare agencies, we aimed to assess: acceptability of our co-designed, manualised training, delivered by non-clinical facilitators; outcome completion feasibility; and costs for a future trial. Methods: This cluster-randomised (2:1) single-blind, feasibility trial involved English homecare agencies. Intervention arm agency staff were offered group videocall sessions: 6 over 3 months, then monthly for 3 months (NIDUS-professional). Family carers (henceforth carers) and clients with dementia (dyads) were offered six to eight complementary, individual intervention sessions (NIDUS-Family). We collected potential trial measures as secondary outcomes remotely at baseline and 6 months: HCW(homecare worker) Work-related Strain Inventory (WRSI), Sense of Competence (SoC); proxy-rated Quality of Life (QOL), Disability Assessment for Dementia scale (DAD), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) and Homecare Satisfaction (HCS). Results: From December 2021 to September 2022, we met agency (4 intervention, 2 control) and HCWs (n=62) recruitment targets and recruited 16 carers and 16/60 planned clients. We met a priori progression criteria for adherence (≥4/6 sessions: 29/44 [65.9%,95% confidence interval (CI): 50.1,79.5]), HCW or carer proxy-outcome completion (15/16 (93.8% [69.8,99.8]) and proceeding with adaptation for HCWs outcome completion (46/63 (73.0% [CI: 60.3,83.4]). Delivery of NIDUS-Professional costs was £6,423 (£137 per eligible client). WRSI scores decreased and SoC increased at follow-up, with no significant between-group differences. For intervention arm proxy-rated outcomes, carer-rated QOL increased, HCWrated was unchanged; carer and HCW-rated NPI decreased; DAD decreased (greater disability) and HCS was unchanged. Conclusion: A pragmatic trial is warranted; we will consider using aggregated, agency-level client outcomes, including neuropsychiatric symptoms.

Item Type: Article
Identifier: 10.1093/ageing/afae074
Keywords: dementia, homecare, training, feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT), carers, older people
Subjects: Medicine and health
Depositing User: Juanita Hoe
Date Deposited: 12 Jun 2024 11:50
Last Modified: 04 Nov 2024 11:21
URI: https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/11938

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Menu