Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews

Stern, Cindy, Lizarondo, Lucylynn, Carrier, Judith, Godfrey, Christina, Reiger, Kendra, Salmond, Susan, Apostolo, Joao, Kilpatrick, Pamela and Loveday, Heather ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2259-8149 (2020) Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis.

[img] PDF
Loveday_etal_JBI_DSRIR_2019_Methodological_guidance_for_the_conduct_of_mixed_methods_systematic_reviews.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 January 2021.

Download (843kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

Introduction: Mixed methods systematic reviews (MMSR) provide a more complete basis for complex decision-making than that currently offered by single method reviews, thereby maximizing their usefulness to clinical and policy decision-makers. Although MMSR are gaining traction, guidance regarding the methodology of combining quantitative and qualitative data is limited. In 2014, the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Mixed Methods Review Methodology Group developed guidance for MMSR, however, since the introduction of this guidance, there have been significant developments in mixed methods synthesis. As such, the methodology group recognized the need to revise the guidance to align it with the current state of knowledge on evidence synthesis methodology
Objective: To outline the updated methodological approach for conducting a JBI MMSR with a focus on data synthesis, specifically, methods related to how data is combined and the overall integration of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. Methods: Between 2015 and 2019 the JBI Mixed Methods Review Methodology Group undertook an extensive review of the literature, held annual face-to-face meetings (which were supplemented by teleconferences and regular email correspondence), sought advice from experts in the field and presented at scientific conferences. This process led to the development of guidance in the form of a Chapter included in the JBI Reviewer’s Manual, the official guidance for conducting JBI systematic reviews. In 2019, the guidance was ratified by the JBI International Scientific Committee.
Results: The updated JBI methodological guidance for conducting a MMSR recommends reviewers take a convergent approach to synthesis and integration whereby the specific method utilized is dependent on the nature/type of question(s) that is (are) posed in the systematic review. The JBI guidance is primarily based on Hong et al and Sandelowski’s typology on MMSR. If the review question can be addressed by both quantitative and qualitative research designs, the convergent integrated approach should be followed which involves data transformation and allows reviewers to combine quantitative and qualitative data. If the focus of the review is on different aspects or dimensions of a particular phenomenon of interest, the convergent segregated approach is undertaken which involves independent synthesis of quantitative data and qualitative data leading to the generation of quantitative evidence and qualitative evidence which are then integrated together.
Conclusions: The updated guidance on JBI MMSR provides foundational work to a rapidly evolving methodology and aligns with other seminal work undertaken in the field of mixed methods synthesis. Limitations to the current guidance are acknowledged and a series of methodological projects identified by the JBI Mixed Methodology Group to further refine the methodology are proposed. Mixed methods review offers an innovative framework for generating unique insights related to the complexities associated with healthcare quality and safety.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: This is the author accepted version of [Stern, C., Lizarondo, L., Carrier, J., Godfrey, C., Rieger, K., Salmond, S., Apostolo, J., Kirkpatrick, P., Loveday, H., 9000. Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis] published in the JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports.
Uncontrolled Keywords: mixed methods; systematic review; integration; data transformation; synthesis
Subjects: Medicine and health > Research methodologies
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Heather Loveday
Date Deposited: 24 Oct 2019 10:23
Last Modified: 05 Mar 2020 16:49
URI: http://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/6458

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Menu