1. D. I. Rigas, Guidelines for Auditory Interface Design: An Empirical Investigation. 1996: PhD thesis, Loughborough University of Technology.
2. D. Rigas, and D. Hopwood, The Role of Multimedia in Interfaces for On-Line Learning. 9th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics (PCI'2003). , Thessaloniki, Greece, 2003.
3. S. Oviatt, "Multimodal Interfaces," The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, 2003.
4. K. Al-Omar, and D. Rigas, An Empirical Investigation of different Interactive Environments in E-Commerce. In Proceedings of the Ninth Informatics Workshop for Research Students, Bradford, UK, p.p. 68-71, June 2008, ISBN: 978-1-85143-251-6.
5. M. M. Alsuraihi, and D. Rigas, Multimodal Interaction Metaphors for Interface Design: an Empirical Investigation on Learnability. Proceedings of the Saudi Innovation Conference 2007, Newcastle University, p.p. 686-694, May 2007, ISBN: 978-0-955104-92-3.
6. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering: Academic Press Inc., US, 1993.
7. M. F. Costabile, "Usability in the Software Life Cycle," Handbook of soft-ware engineering and knowledge engineering, vol. 1, pp. 179–192, 2001.
8. ISO, "ISO 9241: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidelines on usability," pp. 2, 1998.
9. A. Ciuffreda, "An Empirical Investigation in Using Multi-modal Metaphors to Browse Internet Search Results," in Department of Computing, School of Informatics, vol. PhD. Bradford, UK: University of Bradford, 2008.
10. M. Alotaibi, "Electronic Customer Knowledge Management Systems: a Multimodal Interaction Approach," in Informatics Research Institute, vol. PhD. Bradford, UK: University of Bradford, 2009.
11. D. I. Rigas, and D. Memery, and D. Hopwood, and M. A. Rodrigues, "Empirically derived design issues in auditory information processing for mo-bile telephony," Information Technology: Coding and Computing, 2000. Proceedings. International Conference on, pp. 462-469, 2000.
12. C. F. Camerer, (2003). Behavioural Game Theory. NewYork, N.Y: Russell Sage Foundation.
13. F. Fukuyama, (1996). Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. London, UK: Penguin Books.
14. Kramer, R. M. and Tyler, T. R. (1996). Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research. London, UK: Sage
15. I. Markova, (Ed.) (2004). Trust and Democratic Transition in Post-communist Europe. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. D. M. Rousseau, S. B. Sitkin, R. S. Burt, and C.Camerer, (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of Management Review, 23, 393–404.
17. C. Bartneck, and T. Takahashi, and Y. Katagiri, "Cross Cultural Study of Expressive Avatars," Proceedings of the Social Intelligence Design, 2004.
18. M. D. Dickey, "3D virtual worlds: an emerging technology for traditional and distance learning," Proceedings Ohio Learning Network: The convergence of learning and technology— window on the future oln.org/conferences/OLN2003/papers/Dickey3DVirtualWorlds. pdf, 2003.
19. J. Beskow, "Animation of Talking Agents," Proceedings of AVSP, vol. 97, pp. 149-152, 1997.
20. R. Sheth, "Avatar Technology: Giving a Face to the e-Learning Interface," The eLearning Developers‘ Journal, 2003.
21. J. Brooke, "SUS: a" quick and dirty" usability scale," Usability evaluation in industry, pp. 189-194, 1996.
22. S. E. Colesca, "Understanding trust in e-government," Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, vol. 3, pp. 7-15, 2009.