Developing a model of best practice for teams managing crisis in people with dementia: a consensus approach

Yates, Jennifer, Stanyon, Miriam, Challis, David, Coleston-Shields, Donna Maria, Dening, Tom, Hoe, Juanita ORCID:, Jawahar, Kaanthan, Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor, Moniz-Cook, Esme, Poland, Fiona, Streater, Amy, Trigg, Emma and Orrell, Martin (2020) Developing a model of best practice for teams managing crisis in people with dementia: a consensus approach. BMC Psychiatry, 20 (1).

[thumbnail of Yates_et_al._2020._BMC_Psychiatry._Developing_a_model_of_best_practice_for_teams_managing_crisis_in_people_with_dementia_-_a_consensus_approach.pdf]
Yates_et_al._2020._BMC_Psychiatry._Developing_a_model_of_best_practice_for_teams_managing_crisis_in_people_with_dementia_-_a_consensus_approach.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview


Teams delivering crisis resolution services for people with dementia and their carers provide short-term interventions to prevent admission to acute care settings. There is great variation in these services across the UK. This article reports on a consensus process undertaken to devise a Best Practice Model and evaluation Tool for use with teams managing crisis in dementia.

The Best Practice Model and Tool were developed over a three stage process: (i) Evidence gathering and generation of candidate standards (systematic review and scoping survey, interviews and focus groups); (ii) Prioritisation and selection of standards (consultation groups, a consensus conference and modified Delphi process); (iii) Refining and operationalising standards (consultation group and field-testing).

One hundred sixty-five candidate standards arose from the evidence gathering stage; were refined and reduced to 90 through a consultation group exercise; and then reduced to 50 during the consensus conference and weighted using a modified Delphi process. Standards were then operationalised through a clinical consultation group and field-tested with 11 crisis teams and 5 non-crisis teams. Scores ranged from 48 to 92/100. The median score for the crisis teams was 74.5 (range 67–92), and the median score for non-crisis teams was 60 (range 48–72).

With further psychometric testing, this Best Practice Model and Tool will be ideal for the planning, improvement and national benchmarking of teams managing dementia crises in the future.

Item Type: Article
Identifier: 10.1186/s12888-020-02899-0
Keywords: Crisis resolution team, Dementia, Best practice, Fidelity, Consensus
Subjects: Medicine and health > Clinical medicine > Dementia
Medicine and health > Person centered care
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Juanita Hoe
Date Deposited: 11 Oct 2021 10:57
Last Modified: 06 Feb 2024 16:07


Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item