The influence of 'high' vs. 'low' rape myth acceptance on police officers' judgements of victim and perpetrator responsibility, and rape authenticity

Hine, Ben ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9732-4631 and Murphy, Anthony ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0093-6178 (2018) The influence of 'high' vs. 'low' rape myth acceptance on police officers' judgements of victim and perpetrator responsibility, and rape authenticity. Journal of Criminal Justice, 60. pp. 100-107. ISSN 0047-2352

[thumbnail of High vs Low RMA Officers_JournalofCriminalJustice_MainManuscript_24.08.18.docx] Microsoft Word
High vs Low RMA Officers_JournalofCriminalJustice_MainManuscript_24.08.18.docx - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (91kB)

Abstract

Purpose: Previous studies suggest that officers' level of rape myth acceptance (RMA) is predictive of their case decision making and judgements towards victim-survivors. However, few studies have directly assessed the relationship between RMA and responsibility and authenticity judgments.
Methods: 808 UK police officers categorised as 'high' or 'low' in rape myth acceptance made judgements of victim and perpetrator responsibility, and case authenticity, towards one of 16 vignettes depicting a hypothetical rape scenario varying on victim-perpetrator relationship, victim reputation, and initial point of resistance.
Results: Officers categorised as 'high' in RMA rated victims as more responsible, perpetrators as less responsible, and cases as less authentic than those deemed to be 'low' in RMA. When rape-myth related factors were present, both individually and in combination, judgements by officers 'high' in RMA were more negative than those 'low' in RMA.
Conclusions: Results suggest that officers 'high' in RMA may judge victims of rape differently to those 'low' in RMA, particularly when rape myth-related extra-legal case factors are present. The potential implications for training and selection are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Identifier: 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2018.08.001
Subjects: Law and criminal justice > Criminal justice
Psychology
Related URLs:
Depositing User: Ben Hine
Date Deposited: 13 Sep 2018 13:09
Last Modified: 06 Feb 2024 15:58
URI: https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/5382

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Menu