An entropy-based analysis of GPR data for the assessment of railway ballast conditions

Lists

Benedetto, Francesco, Tosti, Fabio ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-9937 and Alani, Amir (2017) An entropy-based analysis of GPR data for the assessment of railway ballast conditions. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 55 (7). pp. 3900-3908. ISSN 0196-2892

[thumbnail of benedetto-tosti-alani-double_IEEE TGRS.pdf]

Preview

PDF
benedetto-tosti-alani-double_IEEE TGRS.pdf - Accepted Version
Download (1MB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2017.2683507

Abstract

The effective monitoring of ballasted railway track beds is fundamental for maintaining safe operational conditions of railways and lowering maintenance costs. Railway ballast can be damaged over time by the breakdown of aggregates or by the upward migration of fine clay particles from the foundation, along with capillary water. This may cause critical track settlements. To that effect, early stage detection of fouling is of paramount importance. Within this context, ground penetrating radar (GPR) is a rapid nondestructive testing technique, which is being increasingly used for the assessment and health monitoring of railway track substructures. In this paper, we propose a novel and efficient signal processing approach based on entropy analysis, which was applied to GPR data for the assessment of the railway ballast conditions and the detection of fouling. In order to recreate a real-life scenario within the context of railway structures, four different ballast/pollutant mixes were introduced, ranging from clean to highly fouled ballast. GPR systems equipped with two different antennas, ground-coupled (600 and 1600 MHz) and air-coupled (1000 and 2000 MHz), were used for testing purposes. The proposed methodology aims at rapidly identifying distinctive areas of interest related to fouling, thereby lowering significantly the amount of data to be processed and the time required for specialist data processing. Prominent information on the use of suitable frequencies of investigation from the investigated set, as well as the relevant probability values of detection and false alarm, is provided.

Item Type:	Article
Identifier:	10.1109/TGRS.2017.2683507
Additional Information:	© 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
Keywords:	Ground penetrating radar; entropy; railway ballast; ballast fouling; performance analysis
Subjects:	Construction and engineering > Civil and environmental engineering Construction and engineering > Digital signal processing Construction and engineering > Electrical and electronic engineering Construction and engineering > Civil and structural engineering
Depositing User:	Fabio Tosti
Date Deposited:	08 Mar 2017 12:31
Last Modified:	04 Nov 2024 12:08
URI:	https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/3216

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item

References

[1] Indraratna, B. 1st Ralph Proctor Lecture of ISSMGE. Railroad performance with special reference to ballast and substructure characteristics. Transportation Geotechnics, 7, pp. 74-114, 2016.
[2] Selig, E. T. & Waters, J. M. Track geotechnology and substructure management. Thomas Telford, London, 1994
[3] Anbazhagan, P., Lijun, S., Buddhima, I., Cholachat, R. Model track studies on fouled ballast using ground penetrating radar and multichannel analysis of surface wave. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 74 (4), pp. 175-184, 2011.
[4] I. L. Al-Qadi, S Zhao, P. Shangguan. Railway Ballast Fouling Detection Using GPR Data: Introducing a Combined Time–Frequency and Discrete Wavelet Techniques. Near Surface Goephysics, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 145-153, 2016.
[5] Anbazhagan, P., Dixit, P.S.N., Bharatha, T.P. Identification of type and degree of railway ballast fouling using ground coupled GPR antennas, Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 126, pp. 183-190, 2016.
[6] De Bold, R., O'Connor, G., Morrissey, J.P., Forde, M.C. Benchmarking large scale GPR experiments on railway ballast, Construction and Building Materials, 92, art. no. 5926, pp. 31-42, 2015.
[7] Feldman, F., and Nissen, D. Alternative testing method for the measurement of ballast fouling: percentage void contamination. In Proceedings of the Conference on Railway Engineering. Railway Technical Society of Australia, Canberra, Australia. pp. 101–109, 2002.
[8] Indraratna, B., Su, L., Rujikiatkamjorn, C. A new parameter for classification and evaluation of railway ballast fouling, Technical note. Can. Geotech. J. 48, 322–326, 2011.
[9] Clark, M., McCann, D.M., Forde, M.C. Infrared thermographic investigation of railway track ballast. NDT and E International, 35 (2), pp. 83-94, 2002.
[10] Anbazhagan, P., Buddhima, I., Amarajeevi, G. Characterization of clean and fouled rail track ballast subsurface using seismic surface survey method: Model and field studies. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 39 (5), pp. 1-11, 2011.
[11] Donohue, S., Gavin, K., Tolooiyan, A. Geophysical and geotechnical assessment of a railway embankment failure. Near Surface Geophysics, 9 (1), pp. 33-44, 2011.
[12] Hugenschmidt J. Railway track inspection using GPR. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 43: 147–155, 2000.
[13] Clark, M.R, Gillespie, R., Kemp, T., McCann, D.M, Forde, M.C. Electromagnetic properties of railway ballast. NDT and E International, 34 (5), pp. 305-311, 2001.
[14] Al-Qadi, I.L., Xie, W., Roberts, R. Scattering analysis of ground-penetrating radar data to quantify railroad ballast contamination. NDT and E International, 41 (6), pp. 441-447, 2008.
[15] R. Roberts, A. Schutz, I.L. Al-Qadi, E. Tutumluer, Characterizing railroad ballast using GPR: recent experiences in the United States. In Proc. of the 2007 4th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR 2007), Naples, Italy, Jun. 2007.
[16] Railway Track and Structures Magazine, June 1985.
[17] Daniels D.J., Ground Penetrating Radar, 2nd Edition. London, U.K.: The Inst. Electrical Eng., 2004.
[18] Sussmann T. R., O’Hara K.R., and Selig E.T. Development of material properties for railway application of ground penetrating radar. In Proc. of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE), vol. 4758, 2002.
[19] Tosti F., Benedetto A., Calvi A., and Bianchini Ciampoli L. Laboratory Investigations for the Electromagnetic Characterization of Railway Ballast through GPR. In Proc. 16th International Conference of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR 2016), Hong Kong, June 13-16, 2016.
[20] Fontul, S., Fortunato, E., De Chiara, F. Evaluation of ballast fouling using GPR. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, GPR 2014, art. no. 6970458, pp. 418-422, 2014
[21] P. Anbazhagan, P.S. Naresh Dixit, T.P. Bharatha, Identification of type and degree of railway ballast fouling using ground coupled GPR antennas. Journal of Applied Geophysics, vol. 126, pp. 183-190, 2016.
[22] R. Roberts, J. Rudy, I. Al-Qadi, E. Tutumluer. Railroad Ballast Fouling Detection Using Ground Penetrating Radar – A New Approach Based on Scattering from Voids. Ninth European Conference on NDT, ECNDT 2006 - Th.4.5.1, 2006.
[23] M.C. Forde, R. De Bold, G. O’Connor, J.P. Morrissey. New analysis of Ground Penetrating Radar testing of a mixed railway trackbed. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, 2010.
[24] Leng, Z., Al-Qadi, I.L. Railroad ballast evaluation using ground-penetrating radar . Transportation Research Record, (2159), pp. 110-117, 2010.
[25] W. Shao, A. Bouzerdoum, S.L. Phung, L. Su, B. Indraratna, C. Rujikiatkamjorn. Automatic classification of ground-penetrating-radar signals for railway-ballast assessment. Geoscience and Remote Sensing IEEE Transactions on, 49 (10), pp. 3961–3972, 2011.
[26] J. Xiao and L. Liu. Multi-frequency GPR signal fusion using forward and inverse S-transform for detecting railway subgrade defects. In Proc. of 8th International Workshop on Advanced Ground Penetrating Radar (IWAGPR), Florence, pp. 1-4, 2015.
[27] Q. Zhang, J. Gascoyne and A. Eriksen. Characterisation of ballast materials in trackbed using ground penetrating Radar: Part 1. In Proc. of 5th IET Conference on Railway Condition Monitoring and Non-Destructive Testing (RCM 2011), pp. 1-8, 2011.
[28] A. Benedetto, F. Tosti, L. Bianchini Ciampoli, L. Pajewski, D. Pirrone, A. Umiliaco, M.G. Brancadoro. A simulation-based approach for railway applications using GPR. In Proc of the 2016 International Conference of Ground Penetrating Radar, Hong Kong, 13-16 June, 2016.
[29] A. Benedetto, F. Benedetto, M. R. De Blasiis, G. Giunta. Reliability of signal processing technique for pavement damages detection and classification using ground penetrating radar. IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 471-480, 2005.
[30] T.K. Sarkar, H. Schwarzlander, Seungwon Choi, M.S. Palma, M.C. Wicks, “Stochastic versus deterministic models in the analysis of communication systems”, IEEE Antennas and Propagation Mag., vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 40-50, 2002.
[31] Z. Thian, E. Blasch, “Compressed sensing for MIMO radar: A stochastic perspective”, IEEE Statistical Signal Processing Workshop (SSP), 2012.
[32] R.M. Howard, A Signal Theoretic Introduction to Random Processes. Wiley, 2016.
[33] S. Miller, D. Childers. Probability and Random Processes: With Applications to Signal Processing and Random Processes. Academic Press, 2012.
[34] A.V. Oppenheim, R.W. Schafer, Digital Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ (1975).
[35] A. Benedetto. Water content evaluation in unsaturated soil using GPR signal analysis in the frequency domain. J. Appl. Geophys., vol. 71, no.1, pp. 26–35, 2010.
[36] A. Benedetto, F. Benedetto, and F. Tosti. GPR applications for geotechnical stability of transportation infrastructures. Nondestruct. Test. Eva., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 253–262, 2012.
[37] F. Benedetto and F. Tosti. GPR spectral analysis for clay content evaluationvby the frequency shift method. J. Appl. Geophys., vol. 97, pp. 89–96, 2013.
[38] F. Tosti, A. Benedetto, L. B. Ciampoli, S. Lambot, C. Patriarca, and E. C. Slob. GPR analysis of clayey soil behaviour in unsaturated conditions for pavement engineering and geoscience applications. Near Surf. Geophys., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 127–144, 2016.
[39] Jaynes, E.T. Gibbs vs Boltzmann entropies. Am. J. Phys. 33 (5), 391–398, 1965.
[40] C.E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27, pp. 379–423 623–656, 1948.
[41] Zhang, Y., Candra, P., Wang, G., Xia, T. 2-D fourier transform to leverage GPR data analysis efficiency. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 64 (1), art. no. 6850057, pp. 103-111, 2015.
[42] J García-Palacios, A Samartín, M Melis. Analysis of the railway track as a spatially periodic structure. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, vol. 226, no. 2, 2012.
[43] J.P. Burg, Maximum entropy spectral analysis, Proc. 37th Ann. Meet. Soc. Explor. Geophys. 1967.
[44] J.P. Burg, Maximum entropy analysis, Ph.D. dissertation Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA, 1975.
[45] B.S. Choi, T.M. Cover, An information-theoretic proof of Burg's maximum entropy spectrum, Proc. IEEE, 72 (8), pp. 1094–1096, 1984.
[46] Y. Inouye, Maximum entropy spectral estimation for regular time series of degenerate rank. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 32 (4), pp. 733–740, 1984.
[47] H. L. Van Trees, Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory. New York: Wiley, 1971.
[48] F. Benedetto, F. Tosti, A signal processing methodology for assessing the performance of ASTM standard test methods for GPR systems. Signal Processing (Elsevier), vol. 132, pp. 327-337, 2017.
[49] Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology. 1997. Evaluating Compliance with FCC Guidelines for Human Exposure to Radiofrequency Elec-tromagnetic Fields, OET Bulletin 65, Edition 97-01.
[50] EN 13450:2002/AC:2004. Aggregates for railway ballast. European Committee for Standardization, 2004.
[51] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) 2011. Roadside Design Guide, 4th edn. AASHTO, Washington, DC.
[52] A. Benedetto, F. Tosti, L. Bianchini Ciampoli, A. Calvi, M.G. Brancadoro, A.M. Alani. Electromagnetic characterization of clean and fouled railway ballast through GPR signal processing and numerical simulation. Construction and Building Materials, Submitted, 2016.

Tools

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

The University of West London

An entropy-based analysis of GPR data for the assessment of railway ballast conditions

Abstract

Downloads

Actions (login required)

Menu