Improving safety of runway overrun through the correct numerical evaluation of rutting in Cleared and Graded Areas

Lists

Benedetto, Andrea, D'Amico, Fabrizio and Tosti, Fabio ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-9937 (2014) Improving safety of runway overrun through the correct numerical evaluation of rutting in Cleared and Graded Areas. Safety Science, 62. pp. 326-338. ISSN 0925-7535

[thumbnail of Benedetto et al_SAFSCI_2014.pdf]

Preview

PDF
Benedetto et al_SAFSCI_2014.pdf - Accepted Version
Download (8MB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.008

Abstract

Aircraft overrun is potentially very dangerous to human life. Statistics show that overrun is mainly due to human errors causing loss of control in wheel alignment, high approach speed, and long touchdown. To prevent such disastrous consequences, advanced material arresting systems are currently being used in the main international airports for construction of Runway Safety Areas (RSAs). Many predictive models have been developed for controlling overrun events: the early reliable numerical models, on the basis of theoretical streamlined assumptions, were gradually replaced. More rigorous models based on Multibody System (MBS) and Finite Element Method (FEM) theories are nowadays much more preferred. These are characterized by high levels of reliability, even though the large number of data required does not always allow an exhaustive description of the domain of analysis. The paper presents an alternative method for predicting rut depths induced by aircraft overrunning. Such method is based on a numerical streamlined model, integrated with measurements from Light Falling Weight Deflectometer (LFWD), to define, section by section, the mechanical properties of soils in Cleared and Graded Areas (CGAs). The method has been validated through in situ tests, showing its high effectiveness and efficiency.

Item Type:	Article
Identifier:	10.1016/j.ssci.2013.09.008
Keywords:	Airport safety; Aircraft overrunning; Prediction of rutting; Cleared and Graded Area; LFWD
Subjects:	Construction and engineering > Civil and environmental engineering Construction and engineering > Built environment Construction and engineering > Civil and structural engineering Computing Construction and engineering
Depositing User:	Fabio Tosti
Date Deposited:	25 May 2016 22:11
Last Modified:	04 Nov 2024 12:18
URI:	https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/2112

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item

References

American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2009. Standard Test Method for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of Soils in Place. Annual Book of ASTM Standards
2009, D4429 - 09a.
Bade, E., 1969. Soft-ground arresting of civil aircraft-influence of gravel depth and tyre inflation pressure. UK Ministry of Defence Technical Report 69001, Hampshire, England. Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough.
Barnes, J.R., 1974. Development of a model technique for investigating the performance of soft-ground arresters for aircraft. UK Ministry of Defence Technical Report 71231, Hampshire, England. Procurement Executive, Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough.
Beaty, I., 1975. An investigation into the rolling resistance if a full size meteor wheel in dry Leighton Buzzard sand using the heavy load friction vehicle. UK Ministry of Defence DRIC-BR-49447, S&T Memo 6–75, DA Mech, England. Procurement Executive.
Belobaba, P.P., Mehdi, B.A., William, S., 2012. Impacts of LCC growth on domestic traffic and fares at largest US airports. Journal of Air Transport Management 18,
21–25.
Benedetto, A., Tosti, F., Di Domenico, L., 2012. Elliptic model for prediction of deflections induced by a Light Falling Weight Deflectometer. Journal of Terramechanics 49 (1), 1–12.
Bennett, D.L., 2005. Engineered material arresting systems (EMAS) for aircraft overruns. U.S. FAA advisory circular AC 150/5220 - 22A, Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, 1992. Airplane characteristics for airport planning, 777. Boeing Document D6–58329, Boeing Commercial Airplane Company, Seattle, Washington.
Coutermarsh, B., 2007. Velocity effect of vehicle rolling resistance in sand. Journal of Terramechanics 44, 275–291.
Crenshaw, B.M., 1972. Aircraft landing gear dynamic loads induced by soil landing fields. Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory - Air Force Systems Command – Air Force Base, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, vol. 1.
David, R.E., 1990. Location of commercial aircraft accidents/incidents relative to runways. FAA Report 90–1. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Safety Oversight.
Deloach, R., Marlowe, J.M., Yager, T.J., 2009. Uncertainty analysis for the evaluation of a passive runway arresting system. NASA Langley Research Center – ATK Space Systems, Hampton, Virginia.
Desai, A., Auad, M.L., Shen, H., Nutt, S.R., 2007. Hybrid composite phenolic foams. U.S. Government. In: Proceedings of Composites & Polycon, Tampa, FL.
Gibbesch, A., 2002. High-speed tyre-soil interaction of aircraft on soft runways. In: Proceedings of 14th International Conference of the International Society for Terrain-Vehicle Systems, Vicksburg, MS, USA.
Gwynne, G.M., 1975. Urea formaldehyde foamed plastic emergency arresters for civil aircraft. UK Ministry of Defence Technical Report 74002, Hampshire, England. Procurement Executive, Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough.
Hall, J., Ayres Jr., M., Wong, D., Appleyard, A., Eddowes, M., Shirazi, H., Speir, R., Pitfield, D., Caves, R., Selezneva, O., Puzin, T., 2008. Analysis of aircraft overruns and undershoots for runway safety areas. ACRP Report 08–3. Washington, DC. Transportation Research Board.
Heymsfield, E., Halsey, T.L., 2007. Sensitivity analysis of engineered material arrestor systems to aircraft and arrestor material characteristics. Transportation Research Record 10, 110–117.
Ho, C.H., Romero, P., 2009. Investigation of existing engineered material arresting system at three U.S. Airports. In: Proceedings of 50th Annual Forum of Transportation Research Forum, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jiang, X., Ci, L., Chi, Y., Yan, J., 2010. TG-FTIR study on urea-formaldehyde resin residue during pyrolysis and combustion. Journal of Hazardous Materials 173 (1–3), 205–210.
Kavussi, A., Rafiei, K., Yasrobi, S., 2010. Evaluation of PFWD as potential quality control tool of pavement layers. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management
16 (1), 123–129.
Kirkland, I.D.L., Caves, R.E., Humphreys, I.M., Pitfield, D.E., 2004. An improved methodology for assessing risk in aircraft operations at airports, applied to runway overruns. Safety Science 42 (10), 891–905.
Lang, C.M., 2004. Financial feasibility and equivalency of runway safety area improvements and engineered material arresting systems. FAA Order 5200.9, Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
Lee, J.L.Y., Chen, D.H., Stokoe, K.H., Scullion, T., 2004. Evaluating potential for reflection cracking with rolling dynamic deflectometer. Transportation Research Record 1869, 16–24.
Liu, C.H., Wong, J.Y., 1996. Numerical simulations of tire-soil interaction based on critical state soil mechanics. Journal of Terramechanics 33 (5), 209–221.
Marisetty, S.C., Bailey, E.D., Micah Hale, W., Heymsfield, E.P., 2008. Development of a soft ground arrestor system. MBTC Final Report 2089, Fayetteville, AR. U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Special Programs Administration.
O’Donnell, M.J., 2005. Engineered material arresting systems (EMAS) for aircraft overruns. U.S. FAA advisory circular AC 150/5220 – 22B, Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration.
PlaneCrashInfo.com Database. http://planecrashinfo.com/database.htm (retrieved 15 May 2012).
Randall, T.G., 1970. Preliminary feasibility study of the arresting of aircraft in a foamed plastic overrun area. Technical Memorandum Naval 213, Hampshire, England. Royal Aircraft Establishment Farnborough.
Richmond, L.D., Brueske, N.W., Debord, K.J., 1968. Aircraft dynamic loads from substandard landing sites, Part II, development of tire-soil mathematical model. AFFDL-TR-67-145, Part II. US Air Force Flight Dynamics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio.
Shoop, S.A., Richmond, P.W., Eaton, R.A., 2001. Estimating rolling friction of loose soil for aircraft takeoff on unpaved runways. ERDC/CRREL TR-01-11. Hanover,
NH: US Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.

Tools

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

The University of West London

Improving safety of runway overrun through the correct numerical evaluation of rutting in Cleared and Graded Areas

Abstract

Downloads

Actions (login required)

Menu