Staff perspectives of single-use versus reusable sterile textiles: A qualitative analysis

Greene, Carolynn ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1170-376X, Youssef, Elaney, Wilson, Jennie ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4713-9662, Kotecha, Pinky and Bhutta, Mahmood F (2026) Staff perspectives of single-use versus reusable sterile textiles: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Surgical Research. (In Press)

[thumbnail of Greene 30April2026.pdf] PDF
Greene 30April2026.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (491kB)

Abstract

Background
Operating theatres contribute significantly to healthcare-related carbon emissions, with single-use surgical textiles being a key contributor. Reusable sterile surgical textiles are available, yet their adoption is not widespread. This study explored the views of hospital staff, including surgeons and those working in procurement, of single-use and reusable sterile textiles.

Method
This qualitative analysis was conducted in one NHS trust in England. Fourteen hospital staff were recruited either via self-selection or purposive sampling to ensure representation of key stakeholders. The semi-structured one-to-one interviews were imported into NVivo software and analysed using Thematic Analysis.

Results
Six themes were developed: 1) current practice, 2) practical considerations, 3) infection prevention concerns, 4) social norms, 5) levers for change, and 6) navigating complex systems. Continued use of single-use surgical textiles was driven by complex procurement systems, convenience, perceived cost, and embedded practices. The transition to reusable sterile textiles was hindered by existing surgical culture, personal preferences and by those in ‘green’ roles experiencing a lack of time, agency and resource to enact change. A key barrier was a perception that reusable textiles increased infection risk, especially in the orthopaedic specialty.

Conclusion
Despite no evidence that single-use surgical textiles offer superior patient protection, the adoption of reusable textiles is constrained by engrained practices and misconceptions. Broader dissemination of lifecycle analysis evidence, coupled with messaging cascaded via national guidance, royal colleges, and local leadership could support both individual and system-wide acceptance of reusable surgical textiles.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Medicine and health
Date Deposited: 29 May 2026
Dates:
Date
Publication status
22 May 2026
Accepted
School, department or research centre: College of Nursing, Midwifery and Healthcare
The Richard Wells Research Centre
URI: https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/14990
Sustainable Development Goals: Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production

Actions (admin access)

View Item

Menu