Communicating the risk of psychiatric in-patient or enhanced community care in dementia

Swirska, Maja; Wolverson, Emma; Underwood, Benjamin R

Communicating the risk of psychiatric in-patient or enhanced community care in dementia

Lists

Swirska, Maja, Wolverson, Emma and Underwood, Benjamin R (2026) Communicating the risk of psychiatric in-patient or enhanced community care in dementia. BJPsych Open, 12 (3).

[thumbnail of WolversonE_Communicating the risk of psychiatric in-patient_VoR.pdf]

Preview

PDF/A
WolversonE_Communicating the risk of psychiatric in-patient_VoR.pdf - Published Version
Download (319kB) | Preview

Official URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/bjpsych-op...

Abstract

Background
Around 10% of people living with dementia (PLWD) will experience a deterioration in their condition that will require urgent (‘crisis’) community support or an in-patient psychiatric admission. We have previously shown that people at high risk of a crisis event can be identified at the point of diagnosis. How the idea that someone is at increased risk of experiencing a crisis event in their care is best communicated is not known. Here, we describe the analysis of interviews with clinicians and PLWD, to understand their perspective and the co-production of tools designed to support risk communication.

Aims
To explore multistakeholder perspectives (healthcare professionals, carers, PLWD; n = 12) on the communication of risk of future in-patient psychiatric admission or enhanced ‘crisis’ community care and develop tools to support communication.

Method
This pilot study used an experience-based, co-design approach. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse transcripts, leading to co-development of draft educational materials.

Results
We identified five themes that inform how risk should be communicated. Participants underlined the importance of timing, setting and follow-up appointments. Digital tools were considered essential, but they were not seen as a substitute to face-to-face appointments. Individual preferences varied, highlighting the need for patient-centred communication. The findings led to the co-development of clinician guidelines and educational materials.

Conclusions
Risk communication in dementia is complex and must be personalised to be most effective. Our findings may have relevance for the communication of other areas of risk in dementia beyond risk of care crises.

Item Type:	Article
Identifier:	10.1192/bjo.2026.11011
Keywords:	Dementia; risk communication; PPIE; qualitative.
Subjects:	Medicine and health > Clinical medicine
Date Deposited:	10 Apr 2026
URI:	https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/14864