Assessment of sexual dimorphism in the humerus among a Greek Cypriot population using binary logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis

Lists

Baer, Erica, La Valley, Anna S. H. and Kyriakou, Xenia Paula (2025) Assessment of sexual dimorphism in the humerus among a Greek Cypriot population using binary logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology. pp. 1-9.

Preview

PDF (PDF/A)
Assessment of sexual dimorphism in the humerus among a Greek Cypriot_accessible.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.
Download (1MB) | Preview

Official URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12024-0...

Abstract

Purpose: Determining the sex of unknown human remains is pertinent to the reconstruction of biological profiles in forensic anthropology. The Greek Cypriot population is underrepresented in forensic anthropology literature, with only a handful of sex estimation studies having been produced thus far. The aim of this research is to provide accurate and reliable methods for estimating the sex of Greek Cypriot remains to forensically evaluate unknown human remains. Methods: This study created classification models using two statistical methods, binary logistic regression (BLR) and linear discriminant function analysis (LDA), to determine which method provided more accurate sex classification based on measurements of the humerus in a Greek Cypriot population. Additionally, cut points were calculated for use in classification. The sample consisted of 119 Greek Cypriots from the Cyprus Research Reference Collection (CRRC; 1975–2015). Four classification models were built, implementing BLR and LDA for both left- and right-side measurements. These models were analyzed using accuracy rates, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), and Cohen’s kappa. Results: The findings revealed that all four models demonstrated good to excellent classification rates based on AUC (0.88–0.91) and accuracy rates (85.56–87.92%). Maximized summed sensitivity and specificity ratios, ranging between 1.55 and 1.76, were used to determine the optimal cut points by measurement. Conclusion: Based on these results, BLR is a better choice to evaluate sexual dimorphism of the humerus in Greek Cypriots. Further, cut points based on individual measurements can serve as useful markers for classifying humeri by sex.

Item Type:	Article
Identifier:	10.1007/s12024-025-00984-y
Keywords:	Sex Estimation, Forensic anthropology, Sexual dimorphism, Humerus, Metric analysis
Subjects:	Law and criminal justice > Criminal justice > Forensic science
Depositing User:	Xenia Paula Kyriakou
Date Deposited:	25 Apr 2025 08:05
Last Modified:	25 Apr 2025 08:06
URI:	https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/13489

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item

References

Klales AR, editor. Sex Estimation of the human skeleton: history, methods, and emerging techniques. London: Academic; 2020.

Spradley MK, Jantz RL. Sex Estimation in forensic anthropol¬ogy: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci. 2011. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 1 1 1 / j . 1 5 5 6 - 4 0 2 9 . 2 0 1 0 . 0 1 6 3 5 . x.

Spradley MK, Stull KE. Advancements in sex and ancestry Esti¬mation. In: Latham KE, Bartelink EJ, Finnegan M, editors. New perspectives in forensic human skeletal identification. London: Elsevier; 2018. pp. 13–21.

Garvin HM. Adult sex Estimation from cranial morphological traits. In: Klales AR, editor. Sex Estimation of the human skel¬eton. London: Academic; 2020. pp. 95–112.

Klales AR, Garvin HM, Gocha TP, Lesciotto KM, Walls M et al. Examining the reliability of morphological traits for sex estima¬tion: Implications for the Walker (2008) and Klales. (2012) meth¬ods. J Forensic Anth. 2020; h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 5 7 4 4 / f a . 2 0 2 0 . 4 0 1 5

Steadman DW, Adams BJ, Konigsberg LW. Statistical basis for positive identification in forensic anthropology. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / a j p a . 2 0 3 9 3.

Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology (SWGANTH). Sex Assessment. 0th Revision, Issue Date: 06/03/2010. 2010. h t t p s : / / w w w . n i s t . g o v / s y s t e m / e s / d o c u m e n t s / 2 0 1 8 / 0 3 / 1 3 / s w g a n t h s e x a s s e s s m e n t . p d f. Accessed 25 Jun 2023.

Kirchengast S. Human sexual dimorphism–a sex and gender per¬spective. Anthropol Anz. 2014. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 1 2 7 / 0 0 0 3 - 5 5 4 8 / 2 0 1 4 / 0 3 7 6.

Ubelaker DH, DeGaglia CM. Population variation in skeletal sexual dimorphism. Forensic Sci Int. 2017. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . f o r s c i i n t . 2 0 1 7 . 0 6 . 0 1 2.

Auerbach BM. Human skeletal variation in the New World during the Holocene: Effects of climate and subsistence across geogra¬phy and time-Part I [dissertation]. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2008.

Kilroy GS, Tallman SD, DiGangi EA. Secular change in mor¬phological cranial and mandibular trait frequencies in European Americans born 1824–1987. Amer J Phys Anthro. 2020. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 0 2 / a j p a . 2 4 1 1 5.

Kranioti EK, García-Donas JG, Prado PA, Kyriakou XP, Lang¬staff HC. Sexual dimorphism of the tibia in contemporary Greek- Cypriots and Cretans: forensic applications. Forensic Sci Int. 2017. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . f o r s c i i n t . 2 0 1 6 . 1 1 . 0 1 8.

Cohen S, Kyriakou XP, Baer E, Gomez J, Kranioti EF. The cor¬relation between sex and ancestry in Greek Cypriots and Cretans using the humerus [Poster presentation]. 2022 American Associa¬tion of Biological Anthropologists Annual Meeting, Denver, CO. 2022.

Diaz A, Hennessy G, Baer E, Kyriakou XP. Sex estimation of modern Greek-Cypriots utilizing measurements of the calca¬neus and talus [Poster presentation]. 2024 American Academy of Forensic Sciences Annual Meeting, Denver, CO. 2024.

Kranioti EF, García-Donas JG, Can IO, Ekizoglu O. Ancestry Estimation of three mediterranean populations based on cranial metrics. Forensic Sci Int. 2018. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . f o r s c i i n t . 2 0 1 8 . 0 2 . 0 1 4.

İşcan MY. Forensic anthropology of sex and body size. Forensic Sci Int. 2005. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . f o r s c i i n t . 2 0 0 4 . 0 9 . 0 6 9.

Santos F, Guyomarc’h P, Bruzek J. Statistical sex determination from craniometrics: comparison of linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression, and support vector machines. Forensic Sci Int. 2014. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . f o r s c i i n t . 2 0 1 4 . 1 0 . 0 1 0.

Ousley SD, Jantz RL. Fordisc 3 and statistical methods for esti¬mating sex and ancestry. In: Dirkmaat DC, editor. A companion to forensic anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell; 2012. pp. 311–29.

Verma R, Krishan K, Rani D, Kumar A, Sharma V, Shrestha R, Kanchan T. Estimation of sex in forensic examinations using logistic regression and likelihood ratios. Forensic Sci Int. 2012. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . f s i r . 2 0 2 0 . 1 0 0 1 1 8.

Kamath VG, Asif M, Shetty R, Avadhani R. Binary logistic regression analysis of foramen magnum dimensions for sex deter¬mination. Anat Res Int. 2015. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 1 5 5 / 2 0 1 5 / 4 5 9 4 2 8.

Kamath V, Asif M, Shetty R, Avadhani R. Binary logistic regres¬sion analysis of hard palate dimensions for sexing human crania. Anat Cell Biol. 2016 h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 5 1 1 5 / % 2 F a c b . 2 0 1 6 . 4 9 . 2 . 1 5 1 .

Attia MH, Aboulnoor BAE. Tailored logistic regression models for sex Estimation of unknown individuals using the published population data of the humeral epiphyses. Leg Med. 2020. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . l e g a l m e d . 2 0 2 0 . 1 0 1 7 0 8.

Amores-Ampuero A, Viciano J. Sexual dimorphism from verte¬brae: its potential use for sex Estimation in an identified osteo¬logical sample. Aust J Forensic Sci. 2020. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 8 0 / 0 0 4 5 0 6 1 8 . 2 0 2 0 . 1 8 4 0 6 2 9.

Curate F, Coelho J, Gonçalves D, Coelho C, Ferreira MT, Navega D, Cunha E. A method for sex Estimation using the proximal femur. Forensic Sci Int. 2016. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . f o r s c i i n t . 2 0 1 6 . 0 6 . 0 1 1.

Saldías E, Malgosa A, Jordana X, Isidro A. Sex Estimation from the navicular bone in Spanish contemporary skeletal collections. Forensic Sci Int. 2016. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . f o r s c i i n t . 2 0 1 6 . 0 8 . 0 0 2.

Bidmos MA, Adebesin AA, Mazengenya P, Olateju OI, Adeg¬boye O. Estimation of sex from metatarsals using discriminant function and logistic regression analyses. Aus J Forensic Sci. 2021. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 8 0 / 0 0 4 5 0 6 1 8 . 2 0 1 9 . 1 7 1 1 1 8 0.

Dong H, Deng M, Wang W, Zhang J, Mu J, Zhu G. (2015). Sex¬ual dimorphism of the mandible in a contemporary Chinese Han population. Forensic Sci Int. 2015; h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . f o r s c i i n t . 2 0 1 5 . 0 6 . 0 1 0

Manjatika AT, Davimes JG, Mazengenya P. Estimation of sex using dimensions around the metatarsal diaphyseal nutrient fora¬men: application of discriminant function analysis and logistic regression models. Leg Med. 2024. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . l e g a l m e d . 2 0 2 4 . 1 0 2 4 1 7.

Ahmed AA, Koko AO, Bahar ME. Estimation of sex based on the sterna of Sudanese adults using multidetector computed tomog¬raphy: a comparison of discriminant function analysis and binary logistic regression. Homo. 2021. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 1 2 7 / h o m o / 2 0 2 1 / 1 3 5 8.

Rani D, Krishan K, Kanchan T. A methodological comparison of discriminant function analysis and binary logistic regression for estimating sex in forensic research and case work. Med Sci Law. 2023. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 1 7 7 / 0 0 2 5 8 0 2 4 2 2 1 1 3 6 6 8

Tabachnick BG, Fidell L. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. New York: Pearson; 2001.

Bartholdy BP, Sandoval E, Hoogland ML, Schrader SA. Get¬ting Rid of dichotomous sex estimations: why logistic regression should be preferred over discriminant function analysis. J Foren¬sic Sci. 2020. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 1 1 1 / 1 5 5 6 - 4 0 2 9 . 1 4 4 8 2.

Liong CY, Foo SF. Comparison of linear discriminant analysis and logistic regression for data classification. AIP Conf Proc. 2013;1159–65. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 0 6 3 / 1 . 4 8 0 1 2 6 2.

Unal I. Defining an optimal cut-point value in ROC analysis: an alternative approach. Comput Math Methods Med. 2017. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 1 5 5 / 2 0 1 7 / 3 7 6 2 6 5 1.

Thiele C, Hirschfeld G. Cutpointr: improved Estimation and vali¬dation of optimal cutpoints in R. J Stat Softw. 2021. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 1 8 6 3 7 / j s s . v 0 9 8 . i 1 1.

Pohar M, Blas M, Turk S. Comparison of logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis: A simulation study. Metodološki Zvezki. 2004. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 5 1 9 3 6 / a y r t 6 2 0 4.

Langley NR, Jantz RL. Secular change. In: Klales AR, editor. Sex Estimation of the human skeleton. London: Academic; 2020. pp. 295–306.
38. Costanza DP, Rudolph CW, Zacher H. Are generations a useful concept? Acta Psychol.

Tools

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

The University of West London

Assessment of sexual dimorphism in the humerus among a Greek Cypriot population using binary logistic regression and linear discriminant analysis

Abstract

Downloads

Actions (login required)

Menu