Adesina, A. Recent advances in the concrete industry to reduce its carbon dioxide emissions. Environ. Chall. 2020, 1, 100004.

Khan, Q.U.Z.; Ali, M.; Ahmad, A.; Raza, A.; Iqbal, M. Experimental and finite element analysis of hybrid fiber reinforced concrete two-way slabs at ultimate limit state. SN Appl. Sci. 2021, 3, 73–85.

Global Cement and Concrete Association. Cement and Concrete Around the World; Global Cement and Concrete Association: London, UK, 2020; Available online: https://gccassociation.org/concretefuture/cement-concrete-around-the-world/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).

European Ready-Mix Concrete Organization. Ready-Mixed Concrete Statistics; ERMCO: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.

European Commission. European Green Deal: Commission Proposes to Boost Renovation and Decarbonisation of Buildings; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2021; Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_21_6683 (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Păunescu, C.; Comănescu, L.; Robert, D.; Săvulescu, I. Polynomial Regression Model for River Erosion Prediction in Transport Infrastructure Development. Int. J. Res. Publ. Rev. 2023, 4, 1731–1737.

Marceau, M.L.; VanGeem, M.G. Life Cycle Assessment of an Insulating Concrete Form House Compared to a Wood Frame House; Portland Cement Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1992.

Adesina, A. Circular Economy in the Concrete Industry. In Handbook of Solid Waste Management; Springer: Singapore, 2021.

Dixit, M.K. Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 79, 390–413.

Pomponi, F.; Moncaster, A. Scrutinising embodied carbon in buildings: The next performance gap made manifest. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 2431–2442.

Zhang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yu, X. Urban metabolism: A review of current knowledge and directions for future study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 11247–11263.

Rama Jyosyula, A.; Sanjayan, J.G.; Wang, C.M. Pathways to Net-Zero Emissions for the Concrete Industry: A Literature Review. Buildings 2020, 10, 233.

BS EN 1992-1-1:2004+A1:2014; Eurocode 2—Design of Concrete Structures: Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. BSI: London, UK, 2015.

Brooker, O. Concrete Buildings Scheme Design Manual; The Concrete Centre: London, UK, 2009.

Bond, A.J.; Harris, A.J.; Moss, R.M.; Brooker, O.; Harrison, T.; Narayanan, R.S.; Webster, R. How to Design Concrete Structures using Eurocode 2, 2nd ed.; The Concrete Centre: London, UK, 2018.

The Concrete Centre. Cost and Carbon: Concept V4; The Concrete Centre: London, UK, 2020; Available online: https://www.concretecentre.com/News/2020/Concept-v4-Cost-and-Carbon.aspx (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Goodchild, C.H.; Webster, R.M.; Elliott, K.S. Economic Concrete Frame Elements to Eurocode 2; The Concrete Centre: London, UK, 2009.

World Bank. World Bank Open Data; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; Available online: https://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).

NASA. Global Climate Change, Vital Signs of the Planet; NASA: Washington, DC, USA, 2023. Available online: https://climate.nasa.gov/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).

ACI 318-19; Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2019. Available online: https://www.concrete.org/store/productdetail.aspx?ItemID=318U19&Language=English&Units=US_Units (accessed on 24 January 2025).

United Nations. Paris Agreement; Technical Report; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Available online: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/the-paris-agreement/the-paris-agreement (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy. Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Greener; Technical Report; Gov.UK: London, UK, 2021. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/net-zero-strategy (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Barbosa, F.; Woetzel, J.; Mischke, J. Reinventing Construction: A Route To Higher Productivity; Technical Report; McKinsey Global Institute: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/operations/our-insights/reinventing-construction-through-a-productivity-revolution (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Akbarnezhad, A.; Xiao, J. Estimation and Minimization of Embodied Carbon of Buildings: A Review. Buildings 2017, 7, 5.

Botzen, W.J.W.; Gowdy, J.M.; Bergh, J.C.J.M.V.D. Cumulative CO2 emissions: Shifting international responsibilities for climate debt. Clim. Policy. 2008, 8, 569–576.

Gan, V.J.L.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Lo, I.M.C. A comprehensive approach to mitigation of embodied carbon in reinforced concrete buildings. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 582–597.

Yeo, D.; Gabbai, R.D. Sustainable design of reinforced concrete structures through embodied energy optimization. Energy Build. 2011, 43, 2028–2033.

Hart, J.; D’Amico, B.; Pomponi, F. Whole-life embodied carbon in multistory buildings: Steel, concrete, and timber structures. J. Ind. Ecol. 2021, 25, 403–418.

Sheng, K.; Woods, J.E.; Bentz, E.; Hoult, N.A. Assessing embodied carbon for reinforced concrete structures in Canada. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2024, 51, 829–840.

Dimoudi, A.; Tompa, C. Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2008, 53, 86–95.

Sansom, M.; Pope, R.J. A comparative embodied carbon assessment of commercial buildings. Struct. Eng. 2012, 90, 38–49.

Röck, M.; Allacker, K.; Auinger, M.; Balouktsi, M.; Birgisdóttir, H.; Fields, M.; Frischknecht, R.; Habert, G.; Sørensen, L.H.H.; Kuittinen, M.; et al. Towards indicative baseline and decarbonization pathways for embodied life cycle GHG emissions of buildings across Europe. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1078, 012055.

BS EN ISO 14040:2006+A1:2020; Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Principles and Framework. BSI Standards Publication: London, UK, 2020.

Puettmann, M.; Pierobon, F.; Ganguly, I.; Gu, H.; Chen, C.; Liang, S.; Jones, S.; Maples, I.; Wishnie, M. Comparative LCAs of Conventional and Mass Timber Buildings in Regions with Potential for Mass Timber Penetration. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13987.

de Paula Filho, J.H.; D’Antimo, M.; Charlier, M.; Vassart, O. Life-Cycle Assessment of an Office Building: Influence of the Structural Design on the Embodied Carbon Emissions. Modelling 2023, 5, 4.

Crawford, R.H. Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Global Construction Industries. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2022, 1218, 012047.

BS EN 1990:2002+A1:2005; Eurocode—Basis of Structural Design. BSI: London, UK, 2010.

Eleftheriadis, S.; Duffour, P.; Mumovic, D. BIM-embedded life cycle carbon assessment of RC buildings using optimised structural design alternatives. Energy Build. 2018, 173, 587–600.

Trinh, H.T.M.K.; Chowdhury, S.; Doh, J.H.; Liu, T. Environmental considerations for structural design of flat plate buildings—Significance of and interrelation between different design variables. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 315, 128123.

Drewniok, M.P. Relationships Between Building Structural Parameters and Embodied Carbon Part 1: Early-Stage Design Decisions; Technical Report; University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 2021.

Hawkins, W.; Orr, J.; Shepherd, P.; Ibell, T. Design, Construction and Testing of a Low Carbon Thin-Shell Concrete Flooring System. Structures 2019, 18, 60–71.

Lee, C.; Ahn, J. Flexural Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames by Genetic Algorithm. J. Struct. Eng. 2003, 129, 762–774.

Leps, M.; Sejnoha, M. New approach to optimization of reinforced concrete beams. Comput. Struct. 2003, 81, 1957–1966.

Orr, J.; Darby, A.; Ibell, T.; Evernden, M. Design methods for flexibly formed concrete beams. Proc. ICE Struct. Build. 2014, 167, 654–666.

Hawkins, W.J.; Herrmann, M.; Ibell, T.J.; Kromoser, B.; Michaelski, A.; Orr, J.J.; Pedreschi, R.; Pronk, A.; Schipper, H.R.; Shepherd, P.; et al. Flexible formwork technologies—A state of the art review. Struct. Concr. 2016, 17, 911–935.

Orr, J.J.; Darby, A.P.; Ibell, T.J.; Evernden, M.C. Innovative reinforcement for fabric-formed concrete structures. In Proceedings of the FRPRCS-10, Tampa, FL, USA, 2–4 April 2011.

Ferreiro-Cabello, J.; Fraile-Garcia, E.; Martinez de Pison Ascacibar, E.; Martinez de Pison Ascacibar, F.J. Minimizing greenhouse gas emissions and costs for structures with flat slabs. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 922–930.

Sahab, M.G.; Ashour, A.F.; Toropov, V.V. Cost optimisation of reinforced concrete flat slab buildings. Eng. Struct. 2005, 27, 313–322.

Eleftheriadis, S.; Duffour, P.; Greening, P.; James, J.; Stephenson, B.; Mumovic, D. Investigating relationships between cost and CO2 emissions in reinforced concrete structures using a BIM-based design optimisation approach. Energy Build. 2018, 166, 330–346.

Fernandez-Ceniceros, J.; Fernandez-Martinez, R.; Fraile-Garcia, E.; Martinez-de Pison, F. Decision support model for one-way floor slab design: A sustainable approach. Autom. Constr. 2013, 35, 460–470.

Keihani, R.; Tohidi, M.; Janbey, A.; Bahadori-Jahromi, A. Enhancing Sustainability of Low to Medium-Rise Reinforced Concrete Frame Buildings in the UK. Eng. Future Sustain. 2023, 1, 216.

Block, P.; Rippmann, M.; Van Mele, T. Compressive Assemblies: Bottom-Up Performance for a New Form of Construction. Archit. Des. 2017, 87, 104–109.

Global Construction Perspectives and Oxford Economics. Global Construction 2030: A Global Forecast of the Construction Industry to 2030; Global Construction Perspectives Limited: London, UK, 2015; Available online: https://www.ciob.org/industry/policy-research/resources/global-construction-CIOB-executive-summary (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Rohden, A.B.; Gacez, M.R. Increasing the sustainability potential of a reinforced concrete building through design strategies: Case study. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2018, 9, e00174.

Buyle, M.; Braet, J.; Audenaert, A. Life cycle assessment in the construction sector: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 26, 379–388.

Rashid, A.F.A.; Yusoff, S. A review of life cycle assessment method for building industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 45, 244–248.

BS EN 15978:2011; Sustainability of Construction Works—Assessment of Environmental Performance of Buildings Calculation Method. BSI: London, UK, 2011.

BS EN ISO 14044:2006+A1:2018; Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment—Requirements and Guidelines. BSI: London, UK, 2018.

Hammond, G.P.; Jones, C.I. Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Energy 2008, 161, 87–98.

Atmaca, A.; Atmaca, N. Life cycle energy (LCEA) and carbon dioxide emissions (LCCO2A) assessment of two residential buildings in Gaziantep, Turkey. Energy Build. 2015, 102, 417–431.

Jones, C.; Hammond, G. Inventory of Carbon & Energy Version 3.0 (ICE V3.0); Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Bath: Bath, UK, 2019.

Gibbons, O.P.; Orr, J.J. How to Calculate Embodied Carbon; IStructE: London, UK, 2020; Available online: https://www.istructe.org/resources/guidance/how-to-calculate-embodied-carbon/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Hu, M. A Building Life-Cycle Embodied Performance Index—The Relationship between Embodied Energy, Embodied Carbon and Environmental Impact. Energies 2020, 13, 1905.

Mohebbi, G.; Bahadori-Jahromi, A.; Ferri, M.; Mylona, A. The Role of Embodied Carbon Databases in the Accuracy of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) Calculations for the Embodied Carbon of Buildings. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7988.

Kiamili, C.; Hollberg, A.; Habert, G. Detailed assessment of embodied carbon of HVAC systems for a new office building based on BIM. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3372.

Alwan, Z.; Jones, P. The importance of embodied energy in carbon footprint assessment. Struct. Surv. 2014, 32, 49–60.

Xu, J.; Pan, W.; Teng, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Q. Internet of things (IoT)-integrated embodied carbon assessment and monitoring of prefabricated buildings. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2022, 1101, 022031.

Huang, L.; Krigsvoll, G.; Johansen, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X. Carbon emission of global construction sector. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 81, 1906–1916.

Ma, L. A building information modeling-based life cycle assessment of the embodied carbon and environmental impacts of high-rise building structures: A case study. Sustainability 2024, 16, 569.

Purnell, P. The carbon footprint of reinforced concrete. Adv. Cem. Res. 2013, 25, 362–368.

Omar, W.; Doh, J.; Panuwatwanich, K.; Miller, D. Assessment of the embodied carbon in precast concrete wall panels using a hybrid life cycle assessment approach in Malaysia. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2014, 10, 101–111.

Granta Design Ltd. The Cambridge Engineering Selector EduPack 2018, Version 18.1.1; Granta Design Ltd.: Cambridge, UK, 2018.

EFCA. Environmental Product Declaration: Concrete Admixtures—Plasticisers and Super Plasticisers; European Federation of Concrete Admixtures Associations Ltd.: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.

Suwondo, R. Towards sustainable seismic design: Assessing embodied carbon in concrete moment frames. Asian J. Civ. Eng. 2024, 25, 3791–3801.

Collins, F. Inclusion of carbonation during the life cycle of built and recycled concrete: Influence on their carbon footprint. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2010, 15, 549–556.

Helsel, M.; Rangelov, M.; Montanari, L.; Spragg, R.; Carrion, M. Contextualizing embodied carbon emissions of concrete using mixture design parameters and performance metrics. Struct. Concr. 2022, 24, 1766–1779.

Hawkins, W.; Orr, J.; Ibell, T.; Shepherd, P. A design methodology to reduce the embodied carbon of concrete buildings using thin-shell floors. Eng. Struct. 2020, 207, 110195.

Bahramian, M.; Yetilmezsoy, K. Life cycle assessment of the building industry: An overview of two decades of research (1995–2018). Energy Build. 2020, 219, 109917.

Dixit, M.K.; Fernández-Solís, J.L.; Lavy, S.; Culp, C.H. Identification of parameters for embodied energy measurement: A literature review. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 1238–1247.

De Wolf, C.; Pomponi, F.; Moncaster, A. Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice. Energy Build. 2017, 140, 68–80.

RICS. Whole Life Carbon Assessment for the Built Environment; Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors: London, UK, 2017; Available online: https://www.rics.org/uk/upholding-professional-standards/sector-standards/building-surveying/whole-life-carbon-assessment-for-the-built-environment/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).

UK Green Building Council. Embodied Carbon: Developing a Client Brief; Technical Report; UKGBC: London, UK, 2018; Available online: https://www.ukgbc.org/ukgbc-work/embodied-carbon-practical-guidance/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Azari, R.; Abbasabadi, N. Embodied energy of buildings: A review of data, methods, challenges, and research trends. Energy Build. 2018, 168, 225–235.

Moncaster, A.M.; Song, J.Y. A comparative review of existing data and methodologies for calculating embodied energy and carbon of buildings. Int. J. Sustain. Build. Technol. Urban Dev. 2012, 3, 26–36.

Chitnis, M.; Sorrell, S.; Druckman, A.; Firth, S.K.; Jackson, T. Turning lights into flights: Estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Policy 2013, 55, 234–250.

Oh, B.K.; Choi, S.W.; Park, H.S. Influence of variations in CO2 emission data upon environmental impact of building construction. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 1194–1203.

Marsh, E.; Orr, J.; Ibell, T. Quantification of uncertainty in product stage embodied carbon calculations for buildings. Energy Build. 2021, 251, 111340.

Allwood, J.M.; Ashby, M.F.; Gutowski, T.G.; Worrell, E. Material efficiency: A white paper. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 362–381.

Giesekam, J.; Barrett, J.; Taylor, P.; Owen, A. The greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation options for materials used in UK construction. Energy Build. 2014, 78, 202–214.

Birgisdottir, H.; Wiberg, A.H.; Malmqvist, T.; Moncaster, A.; Rasmussen, F.N. Subtask 4-Case Studies and Recommendations for the Reduction of Embodied Energy and Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Buildings: Evaluation of Embodied Energy and CO2eq for Building Construction; Technical Report; IEA: Paris, France, 2016.

Lützkendorf, T.; Balouktsi, M. Guideline for Design Professionals and Consultants Part 1: Basics for the Assessment of Embodied Energy and Embodied GHG Emissions; IEA: Tokyo, Japan, 2016; Available online: http://www.iea-ebc.org/Data/publications/EBC_Annex_57_Guideline_for_Designers_Part_1.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Lupíšek, A.; Vaculíková, M.; Št, Č.; Hodková, J.; Růžiľka, J. Design strategies for low embodied carbon and low embodied energy buildings: Principles and examples. Energy Procedia 2015, 83, 147–156.

Alberici, S.; de Beer, J.; van der Hoorn, I.; Staats, M. Fly Ash and Blast Furnace Slag for Cement Manufacturing; Technical Report; Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy UK: London, UK, 2017. Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/660888/fly-ash-blast-furnace-slag-cement-manufacturing.pdf (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Gan, V.J.; Chan, C.M.; Tse, K.T.; Lo, I.M.; Cheng, J.C. A comparative analysis of embodied carbon in high-rise buildings regarding different design parameters. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 663–675.

Giesekam, J.; Barrett, J.R.; Taylor, P. Construction sector views on low carbon building materials. Build. Res. Inf. 2016, 44, 423–444.

Orr, J.; Drewniok, M.P.; Walker, I.; Ibell, T.; Copping, A.; Emmitt, S. Minimising energy in construction: Practitioners’ views on material efficiency. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 140, 125–136.

Kershaw, T.; Simm, S. Thoughts of a design team: Barriers to low carbon school design. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2014, 11, 40–47.

Paik, I.; Na, S. Comparison of environmental impact of three different slab systems for life cycle assessment of a commercial building in South Korea. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 7278.

UN Environment; Scrivener, K.L.; John, V.M.; Gartner, E.M. Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 2–26.

Favier, A.; de Wolf, C.; Scrivener, K.; Habert, G. A Sustainable Future for the European Cement and Concrete Industry, Technology Assessment for Full Decarbonisation of the Industry by 2050; ETH Zurich and EPFL: Zurich, Switzerland, 2018.

Jayasinghe, A.; Orr, J.; Ibell, T.; Boshoff, W.P. Comparing different strategies of minimising embodied carbon in concrete floors. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 345, 131177.

Jayasinghe, A.; Orr, J.; Ibell, T.; Boshoff, W.P. Minimising embodied carbon in reinforced concrete flat slabs through parametric design. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 50, 104136.

Ismail, M.A.; Mueller, C.T. Minimizing embodied energy of reinforced concrete floor systems in developing countries through shape optimization. Eng. Struct. 2021, 246, 112955.

Orr, J. MEICON: Minimising Energy in Construction. In Survey of Structural Engineering Practice Report; University of Bath: Bath, UK, 2018.

D’Amico, B.; Pomponi, F. On mass quantities of gravity frames in building structures. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 31, 101426.

Foraboschi, P.; Mercanzin, M.; Trabucco, D. Sustainable structural design of tall buildings based on embodied energy. Energy Build. 2014, 68, 254–269.

Ismail, M.A.; Mayencourt, P.L.; Mueller, C.T. Shaped beams: Unlocking new geometry for efficient structures. Arch. Struct. Constr. 2021, 1, 37–52.

Oval, R.; Nuh, M.; Costa, E.A.; Orr, J.; Shepherd, P.A. A prototype low-carbon segmented concrete shell building floor system. Structures 2023, 49, 124–138.

Meibodi, A.; Jipa, A.; Giesecke, R.; Shammas, D.; Bernhard, M.; Leschok, M.; Graser, K.; Dillenburger, B. Smart slab: Computational design and digital fabrication of a lightweight concrete slab. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of ACADIA, Mexico City, Mexico, 18–20 October 2018; pp. 434–443.

Feickert, K.; Mueller, C.T. Thin shell foundations: Quantification of embodied carbon reduction through materially efficient geometry. Arch. Struct. Const. 2023, 1, 15–36.

Bozicek, D.; Kunic, R.; Kosir, M. Interpreting environmental impacts in building design: Application of a comparative assertion method in the context of the EPD scheme for building products. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 123399.

Kang, G.; Kim, T.; Kim, Y.W.; Cho, H.; Kang, K.I. Statistical analysis of embodied carbon emission for building construction. Energy Build. 2015, 105, 326–333.

Broyles, J.M.; Gevaudan, J.P.; Hopper, M.W.; Solnosky, R.L.; Brown, N.C. Equations for early-stage design embodied carbon estimation for concrete floors of varying loading and strength. Eng. Struct. 2024, 301, 116847.

Gauch, H.L.; Hawkings, W.; Ibell, T.; Allwood, J.M.; Dunant, C.F. Carbon vs. cost option mapping: A tool for improving early-stage design decisions. Autom. Constr. 2022, 136, 104178.

Soutsos, M.; Hatzitheodorou, A.; Kanavaris, F.; Kwasny, J. Effect of temperature on the strength development of mortar mixes with GGBS and fly ash. Mag. Concr. Res. 2017, 69, 787–801.

Arnold, W.; Astel, P.; Forman, T.; Drewniok, M. The Efficient Use of GGBS in Reducing Global Emissions; Institution of Structural Engineers: London, UK, 2023.

Dhandapani, Y.; Marsh, A.T.M.; Rahmon, S.; Kanavaris, F.; Papakosta, A.; Bernal, S.A. Suitability of excavated London clay as a supplementary cementitious material: Mineralogy and reactivity. Mater. Struct. 2023, 56, 174.

Hanifa, M.; Agarwal, R.; Sharma, U.; Thapliyal, P.C.; Singh, L.P. A review on CO2 capture and sequestration in the construction industry: Emerging approaches and commercialised technologies. J. CO2 Util. 2023, 67, 102292.

Miller, S.A.; Horvath, A.; Monteiro, P.J.M. Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 074029.

Cembureau. Cementing the European Green Deal: Reaching Climate Neutrality Along the Cement and Concrete Value Chain by 2050; The European Cement Association: Brussels, Belgium, 2020.

Arnold, W. The Hierarchy of Net Zero Design; The Institution of Structural Engineers: London, UK, 2021; Available online: https://www.istructe.org/resources/blog/the-hierarchy-of-net-zero-design/ (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Oh, B.K.; Glisic, B.; Ho, S.; Cho, T.; Seon, H. Comprehensive investigation of embodied carbon emissions, costs, design parameters, and serviceability in optimum green construction of two-way slabs in buildings. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 222, 111–128.

Habert, G.; Roussel, N. Study of two concrete mix-design strategies to reach carbon mitigation objectives. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2009, 31, 397–402.

Zhang, X.; Wang, F. Assessment of embodied carbon emissions for building construction in China: Comparative case studies using alternative methods. Energy Build. 2016, 130, 330–340.

Tae, S.; Baek, C.; Shin, S. Life cycle CO2 evaluation on reinforced concrete structures with high-strength concrete. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2011, 31, 253–260.

Hou, S.; Li, H.; Rezgui, Y. Ontology-based approach for structural design considering low embodied energy and carbon. Energy Build. 2015, 102, 75–90.

Choi, S.W.; Oh, B.K.; Park, J.S.; Park, H.S. Sustainable design model to reduce environmental impact of building construction with composite structures. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 137, 823–832.

Martí, J.V.; García-Segura, T.; Yepes, V. Structural design of precast-prestressed concrete U-beam road bridges based on embodied energy. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 120, 231–240.

Phillips, J.; Spector, T.; Mansy, K.; Homer, J.; Crawford, W. Structural System Selection for a Building Design Based on Energy Impact. In Proceedings of the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Virtual, 26–29 July 2021.

Zhang, X.; Zhang, X. Low-carbon design optimization of reinforced concrete building structures using genetic algorithm. Build. Res. Inf. 2023, 23, 1888–1902.

Broyles, J.M.; Hopper, M.W. Assessment of the embodied carbon performance of post-tensioned voided concrete plates as a sustainable floor solution in multistory buildings. Eng. Struct. 2023, 295, 116847.

Liu, C.H.J.; Pomponi, F.; D’Amico, B. The Extent to Which Hemp Insulation Materials Can Be Used in Canadian Residential Buildings. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14471.

Nguyen, K.; Morgan, S. Comparing the Environmental Impacts of Using Mass Timber and Structural Steel. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 380, 135082.

Ranganath, S.; McCord, S.; Sick, V. Assessing the maturity of alternative construction materials and their potential impact on embodied carbon for single-family homes in the American Midwest. Front. Built Environ. 2024, 10, 1384191.

Lobaccaro, G.; Wiberg, A.H.; Ceci, G.; Manni, M.; Lolli, N.; Berardi, U. Parametric design to minimize the embodied GHG emissions in a ZEB. Energy Build. 2018, 167, 106–123.

Lanjewar, B.; Chippagiri, R.; Dakwale, V.; Ralegaonkar, R.V. Application of Alkali-Activated Sustainable Materials: A Step towards Net Zero Binder. Energies 2023, 16, 969.

Morris, F.; Allen, S.; Hawkins, W. On the embodied carbon of structural timber versus steel, and the influence of LCA methodology. Build. Environ. 2021, 203, 108285.

Mehta, P.K.; Monteiro, P.J.M. Concrete: Microstructure, Properties, and Materials, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2014.

Bhanja, S.; Sengupta, B. Influence of silica fume on the tensile strength of concrete. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 743–747.

Siddique, R. Utilization of silica fume in concrete: Review of hardened properties. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 923–932.

Davidovits, J. Geopolymers: Inorganic polymeric new materials. J. Therm. Anal. 1991, 37, 1633–1656.

Hoffmann, C.; Schubert, S.; Leemann, A.; Motavalli, M. Recycled concrete and mixed rubble as aggregates: Influence of variations in composition on the concrete properties and their use as structural material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 35, 701–709.

Gan, V.J.L.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Lo, I.M.C. A systematic approach for low carbon concrete mix design and production. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture and Sustainable Infrastructure, Hong Kong, China, 15–17 June 2015; pp. 123–128.

Dixit, M.K.; Fernández-Solís, J.L.; Lavy, S.; Culp, C.H. Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 3730–3743.

Sarma, K.C.; Adeli, H. Cost Optimization of Concrete Structures. J. Struct. Eng. 1998, 124, 570–578.

Camp, C.V.; Pezeshk, S.; Hansson, H. Flexural Design of Reinforced Concrete Frames Using a Genetic Algorithm. J. Struct. Eng. 2003, 129, 105–115.

Ferreiro-Cabello, J.; Fraile-Garcia, E.; Martinez de Pison Ascacibar, E.; Martinez-de Pison, F. Metamodel-based design optimization of structural one-way slabs based on deep learning neural networks to reduce environmental impact. Eng. Struct. 2018, 155, 91–101.

Perea, C.; Alcala, J.; Yepes, V.; Gonzalez-Vidosa, F.; Hospitaler, A. Design of reinforced concrete bridge frames by heuristic optimization. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2008, 39, 676–688.

Zhang, H.; Zhai, D.; Yang, Y.N.; Yuan, R. Finite element modeling and performance analysis of concrete structures considering complex loading conditions. Eng. Struct. 2018, 153, 414–430.

Hussain, Q.; Javed, M.; Ahmed, W.; Pervaiz, H. Advanced computational methods for structural analysis: A review of FEA applications in concrete structures. Comput. Struct. 2018, 215, 66–81.

Rashid, K.; Razzaq, A.; Ahmad, M.; Rashid, T.; Tariq, S. Experimental and analytical selection of sustainable recycled concrete with ceramic waste aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 154, 829–840.

Tiutkin, A.; Bondarenko, V. Parametric Analysis of the Stress-Strain State for the Unsupported and Supported Horizontal Underground Workings. Acta Tech. Jaurinensis 2022, 14, 81–92.

Bendsøe, M.P.; Kikuchi, N. Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 1988, 71, 197–224.

Khee, Y.Y.; Li, G.Q.; Li, Z.X. Topology optimization of concrete structures with sustainability considerations. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 2014, 49, 1027–1042.

Rivero-Romero, M.; Marquez-Dominguez, S.; Hernandez-Castillo, H.A. High-strength concrete: Development and experimental validation. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2016, 28, 04015196.

Fujisawa, M.; Nakai, H.; Tsuchida, S. Performance evaluation of CFRP reinforced concrete structures. Compos. Struct. 2016, 143, 262–270.

Faraco, B.; Carloni, C.; D’Antino, T. Mechanical properties of FRP-strengthened concrete elements. Eng. Struct. 2016, 124, 126–136.

Kahsay, M.T.; Hansen, H.K. Precast concrete elements: A sustainable choice for structural systems. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2016, 27, 227–235.

Meyer, C. The greening of the concrete industry. Cem. Concrete. Compos. 2009, 31, 601–605.

Lachimpadi, S.K.; Pereira, J.J.; Taha, M.R.; Mokhtar, M. Construction waste minimisation comparing conventional and precast construction. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 68, 96–103.

Kwan, A.K.H.; Wong, H.H.C.; Poon, C.S. Design optimization of high-strength concrete structures using advanced analysis methods. Struct. Concr. 2015, 16, 102–115.

Mirschel, G.; Krüger, M.; Burkert, A. High-performance concrete: Mechanical properties and serviceability aspects. Struct. Concr. 2020, 21, 168–177.

Kumar, S.; Sharma, B.; Gupta, R. Performance evaluation of fiber-reinforced concrete with varying fiber contents. J. Build. Eng. 2018, 20, 264–271.

Teng, J.G.; Chen, J.F.; Smith, S.T. Design guidelines for prestressed concrete structures. J. Constr. Steel Res. 2015, 106, 57–69.

Misra, S. Prestressed Concrete Structures: Analysis and Design. J. Bridge Eng. 2014, 19, 04014043.

Zhang, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, C.; Wang, B. Integration of BIM and optimization techniques for building design: A comprehensive review. Build. Environ. 2019, 151, 13–27.

Jia, X.; Zhao, M.; Di, B.; Jin, W. Advanced monitoring technologies for concrete structures: A review. Struct. Health Monit. 2015, 14, 343–363.

Bažant, Z.P.; Hubler, M.H.; Yu, Q. Pervasive design adjustments for concrete structures to control deflection. Cem. Concr. Res. 2012, 42, 1431–1444.

Makuvaro, T.; Kearsley, E.P.; van Zijl, G. Design optimization strategies for sustainable concrete structures. Struct. Concr. 2018, 19, 1987–1998.

Gîrbacea, I.A.; Dan, S.; Florut, S.C. Experimental investigation of voided RC slabs with spherical voids. Eng. Struct. 2019, 197, 109403.

Huda, F.; Jumat, M.Z.B.; Islam, A.B.M.S. State of the art review of voided slab system application in construction. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2016, 22, 1006–1017.

Ahmed, I.; Tsavdaridis, K.D. Life cycle assessment and environmental impact of voided biaxial slab systems. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 42, 102757.

Brambilla, G.; Lavagna, M.; Vasdravellis, G.; Castiglioni, C.A. Environmental benefits of prefabricated voided floor systems. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 45, 642–651.

Afanasyev, A.A. Development of non-extractable void formers for concrete slabs. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 26, 100873.

Vizinho, R.V.; Santos, C.C.; Gomes, M.G. Performance analysis of voided slabs with non-extractable formers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 305, 124773.

Tuan, L.A.; Vinh, T.D. Innovative Concrete Solutions: The Role of Voided Slabs in Sustainable Construction. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 264, 120132.

Poon, C.S.; Shui, Z.H.; Lam, L. Effect of microstructure of ITZ on compressive strength of concrete prepared with recycled aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2004, 18, 461–468.

Vermeulen, Y.; Blocken, B.; Hensen, J.L.M. Recycled concrete aggregates: A review of mechanical and durability properties. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 28, 201–208.

Tam, V.W.Y.; Soomro, M.; Evangelista, A.C.J. A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications (2000–2017). Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 172, 272–292.

Tam, V.W.Y.; Gao, X.F.; Tam, C.M. Microstructural analysis of recycled aggregate concrete produced from two-stage mixing approach. Cem. Concr. Res. 2005, 35, 1195–1203.

Aoyagi, K.; Yoshida, Y.; Yamada, K. Environmental assessment of recycled aggregate concrete considering CO2 emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1931–1938.

Neha, K.; Ansari, M.F. Performance enhancement of concrete using waste mineral powders as supplementary cementitious materials. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 367, 130564.

Xiao, J.; Li, W.; Fan, Y.; Huang, X. An overview of study on recycled aggregate concrete in China (1996–2019). Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 134, 191–203.

Guo, H.; Shi, C.; Guan, X.; Zhu, J.; Ding, Y.; Ling, T.C.; Zhang, H.; Wang, Y. Durability of recycled aggregate concrete—A review. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2018, 89, 251–259.

Galvín, A.P.; Ayuso, J.; Jiménez, J.R.; Agrela, F. Comparison of batch leaching tests and influence of pH on the release of metals from construction and demolition wastes. Waste Manag. 2020, 81, 168–179.

Galvín, A.P.; Ayuso, J.; Agrela, F.; Barbudo, A.; Jiménez, J.R. Analysis of leaching procedures for environmental characterization of recycled aggregate from construction and demolition waste. Waste Manag. 2023, 107, 115–123.

Snellings, R.; Mertens, G.; Elsen, J. Supplementary cementitious materials. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2022, 74, 211–278.

Di Maria, A.; Eyckmans, J.; Van Acker, K. Downcycling versus recycling of construction and demolition waste: Combining LCA and LCC to support sustainable policy making. Waste Manag. 2018, 75, 3–21.

Thomas, M.D.A.; Hooton, R.D.; Scott, A.; Zibara, H. The effect of supplementary cementitious materials on chloride binding in hardened cement paste. Cem. Concr. Res. 2022, 42, 1–7.

Payá, J.; Monzó, J.; Borrachero, M.V.; Velázquez, S. Evaluation of the pozzolanic activity of fluid catalytic cracking catalyst residue (FC3R). Cem. Concr. Res. 2023, 33, 603–609.

Ponnada, M.R.; Prasad, S.S.; Dharna, H. Composite sustainability index for optimizing recycled aggregate concrete: A case study approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 292, 126012.

Scrivener, K.L.; Lothenbach, B.; De Belie, N.; Gruyaert, E.; Skibsted, J.; Snellings, R.; Vollpracht, A. RILEM TC 238-SCM: Hydration and microstructure of concrete with SCMs. Mater. Struct. 2015, 48, 835–862.

McNeil, K.; Kang, T.H.K. Recycled concrete aggregates: A review. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2023, 7, 61–69.

Silva, R.V.; de Brito, J.; Dhir, R.K. Use of recycled aggregates arising from construction and demolition waste in new construction applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117629.

Taranath, B.S. Reinforced Concrete Design of Tall Buildings; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010.

Jang, H.; Ahn, Y.; Roh, S. Comparison of the embodied carbon emissions and direct construction costs for modular and conventional residential buildings in South Korea. Buildings 2022, 12, 51.

Munro, M.; Kanavaris, F.; Orr, J. A critical review of embodied carbon classification schemes for concrete. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2024, 21, e04021.

Huang, Y. Life-cycle assessments of different roof types in concrete structures. Energy Rep. 2023, 9, 123–135.

Drewniok, M.; Kwan, A.; Hossain, M. Comparative analysis of embodied carbon in different slab types. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120130.

Kaethner, A.; Burridge, R. Embodied CO2 of structural frames. Struct. Eng. 2012, 90, 8.

Miller, D.; Doh, J.H.; Lima, M.M.; van Oers, N. Embodied energy assessment of the structural system in concrete buildings: A case study on 7 south east Queensland structures. In Proceedings of the 23rd Australasian Conference on the Mechanics of Structures and Materials (ACMSM23), Byron Bay, Australia, 9–12 December 2014.

Paik, J.; Na, J.; Yoon, S. Assessment of CO2 Emissions by Replacing an Ordinary Reinforced Concrete Slab with the Void Slab System in a High-Rise Commercial Residential Complex Building in South Korea. Sustainability 2019, 11, 82.

Foraboschi, P.; Bianchi, G. Analysis of lightweight products in voided slabs. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 64, 1–8.

Huang, W.; Li, Q.; Zhang, N.; Su, Y. Innovative floor systems for sustainable buildings: Material efficiency and structural optimization. Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 2018, 27, e1475.

Balakrishnan, B.; Menon, D. Square Beam–Slab Systems: Resolving a Design Controversy Related to Collapse Mechanism. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. A 2020, 101, 361–370.

Burridge, J. How to Specify Lower Carbon Concrete Now. Concrete Magazine–The Concrete Centre. 2020. Available online: https://www.concretecentre.com/News/2021/How-to-specify-lower-carbon-concrete-now.aspx (accessed on 24 January 2025).

Saran, S.; Singh, A. Performance analysis of flat and ribbed slabs in building construction. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2021, 12, 1–10.

Daham, M. The impact of ribbed and waffle slabs on embodied carbon in construction. J. Clean. Prod. 2011, 19, 1123–1130.

Macpherson, R. Whole Building Life Cycle Assessment of New Multi-Unit Residential Buildings in Southern Ontario; Technical Report; University of Toronto: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2024.

Jayasinghe, A.; Orr, J.; Ibell, T.; Boshoff, W.P. Minimising embodied carbon in reinforced concrete beams. Eng. Struct. 2021, 242, 112590.

Faridmehr, I.; Nehdi, M.; Nikoo, M.; Valerievich, K. Predicting embodied carbon and cost effectiveness of post-tensioned slabs using novel hybrid firefly ANN. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12319.

Bosbach, J. Digital Prefabrication of Lightweight Building Elements for Circular Economy: Material-Minimised Ribbed Floor Slabs Made of Extruded Carbon Reinforced Concrete (ExCRC). Buildings 2023, 13, 2928.

Xie, H.; Wu, C.; Chen, G. Analysis of embodied carbon in reinforced concrete flat slab structures. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 15, 156–165.

Jayasinghe, A.; Orr, J.; Ibell, T.; Boshoff, W.P. Comparing the embodied carbon and cost of concrete floor solutions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 324, 129268.

Lyu, H.M.; Shen, S.L.; Zhou, A.; Yang, J. Assessment of embodied carbon in conventional beam and slab floor systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 189, 567–579.

Al-Khazraji, H.; Abbas, A.L.; Mohammed, A.S. Environmental impact analysis of reinforced concrete beam and slab systems. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00942.

Barbieri, G.; Biolzi, L.; Bocciarelli, M. Embodied carbon assessment of floor systems in multi-story buildings. Struct. Concr. 2018, 19, 1968–1979.

Miller, R.; Thompson, L. Concrete slab comparison and embodied energy optimisation for alternate design and construction techniques. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 75, 71–78.

Syed, S.; Hargeaves, J.A.; Mountain, C.M.; Salehi, H. Optimal Structural System Selection Based on Embodied Carbon Comparison for a Multi-Story Office Building. Buildings 2023, 13, 2260.

Jamil, M.; Khan, M.N.N.; Karim, M.R. Analysis of embodied carbon in ribbed slab construction. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 23, 277–284.

Teodosio, B.; Wasantha, P.L.P.; Yaghoubi, E.; Guerrieri, M.; Fragomeni, S.; van Staden, R. Environmental, economic, and serviceability attributes of residential foundation slabs: A comparison between waffle and stiffened rafts using multi-output deep learning. J. Build. Eng. 2023, 80, 107983.

Ibrahim, A.; Mahmoud, E.; Yamin, M. Sustainable design of reinforced concrete ribbed slabs with recycled aggregates. Sustainability 2016, 8, 920.

Sabr, A.K.; Mohammed, M.K.; Ahmed, A.S. Environmental assessment of waffle slab systems in multi-story buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2019, 24, 100745.

Alexander, S.; Lantsoght, E.O.L. Analysis of embodied carbon in waffle slabs with high-strength concrete. Struct. Concr. 2018, 19, 1931–1942.

Zhang, L.; Xie, Q.; Wu, X.-X.; Yang, T.-C.; Chen, W.-W.; Xue, S. Post-fire flexural behavior of prefabricated steel truss concrete waffle slab. Structures 2025, 73, 108417.

Saeed, M.A.; Khan, M.A.; Qureshi, L.A. Embodied carbon assessment of lightweight waffle slab systems. Buildings 2023, 13, 1568.

Chae, Y.S.; Strand, R.K. Modeling ventilated slab systems using a hollow core slab model. Build. Environ. 2013, 60, 199–207.

Ceesay, J.; Miyazawa, S. High-performance concrete in waffle slab construction: Environmental impact analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 57–68.

Baballëku, M.; Isufi, B.; Ramos, A.P. Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Joist and Wide-Beam Floors during the 26 November 2019 Albania Earthquake. Buildings 2023, 13, 1149.

Park, J.; Lee, D.-W.; Choe, D.-I.; I’ST Technology Institute. Mechanical Characteristics of Retractable Radial Cable Roof Systems. J. Korean Assoc. Spat. Struct. 2017, 17, 21–30.

Wan, G.; Audi, C.; Sasani, M. Modeling floor systems for collapse analysis. Eng. Struct. 2016, 141, 48–58.

Ahmad, M. Financial comparative study between post-tensioned and reinforced concrete flat slab. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. Appl. 2022, 3, 67–75.

Husain, M. Optimization of post-tensioned concrete slabs for embodied carbon reduction. J. Struct. Eng. 2013, 139, 1465–1473.

Miller, D.; Doh, J.H.; Peters, T. Environmental impact assessment of post-tensioned slabs. Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build. 2015, 24, 469–484.

Schwetz, P.F.; Gastal, F.P.; Silva Filho, L.C. Post-tensioned slabs with recycled aggregates: Embodied carbon analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 83, 410–419.

Johnson, R.P.; Anderson, D.; Collins, M.P. Lightweight post-tensioned concrete: Environmental considerations. Struct. Concr. 2015, 16, 458–467.

Ranzi, G.; Ostinelli, A. Ultimate behaviour and design of post-tensioned composite slabs. Eng. Struct. 2017, 150, 711–718.

Prakashan, S.; George, K.P.; Thomas, S. Embodied carbon analysis of hollow-core slabs. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 115, 362–370.

Alali, A.; Huang, Y.; Tsavdaridis, K. Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of the composite prefabricated ultra-shallow slabs (PUSS) and hollow core slabs in the UK. J. Build. Eng. 2024, 96, 110588.

Araujo, D.L.; Pinto, R.C.A. Low-carbon concrete in hollow-core slabs: Environmental assessment. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 31, 101327.

Ferreira, F.P.V.; Tsavdaridis, K.D.; Martins, C.H.; De Nardin, S. Steel-Concrete Composite Beams with Precast Hollow-Core Slabs: A Sustainable Solution. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4230.

Baioni, E.; Maretto, M.; Ruggeri, P. Nervi-style ribbed slabs: Structural efficiency and carbon footprint. J. Build. Eng. 2017, 12, 194–203.

Amir, S. Environmental impact assessment of recycled aggregate concrete in Nervi-style slabs. Sustainability 2024, 16, 157.

Putri, R.; Rahman, A.; Ibrahim, A. Carbon footprint analysis of arched concrete slabs. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 42, 102746.

Al-Bayati, G.; Al-Mahaidi, R.; Kalfat, R. Structural assessment of arched concrete slabs. Eng. Struct. 2015, 101, 117–125.

Barenys, J.; Fernandez-Llebrez, J.; Casals, M. Environmental impact of curved concrete slabs with recycled aggregates. Buildings 2022, 12, 1253.