A novel geo-statistical approach for transport infrastructure network monitoring by persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI)

Lists

Gagliardi, Valerio, Bianchini Ciampoli, Luca, D'Amico, Fabrizio, Tosti, Fabio ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-9937, Alani, Amir and Benedetto, Andrea (2020) A novel geo-statistical approach for transport infrastructure network monitoring by persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI). In: IEEE Radar Conference 2020, 21-25 September 2020, Florence, Italy.

[thumbnail of Radar_2020_Paper_Kriging.pdf]

Preview

PDF
Radar_2020_Paper_Kriging.pdf - Accepted Version
Download (894kB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1109/radarconf2043947.2020.9266...

Abstract

Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) is an Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) technique based on a multi-temporal interferogram analysis of SAR images. The aim of the technique is to extract long-term high phase stability benchmarks of coherent point targets, namely Persistent Scatterers (PS). In the last decades, several approaches have been developed to obtain PSI point targets, proving their viability for applications to transport infrastructure monitoring and surveillance. However, SAR satellites can only detect displacements in the Line-of-Sight (LoS), with reference to the specific orbit-related incident angle. This work proposes a novel geo-statistical approach to ease post-processing of large datasets of PSs resulting from the application of the PSI algorithms over an area of interest. The approach aims at correcting the component of the displacement collected from the acquisition geometry of the sensor.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
ISSN:	2375-5318
ISBN:	9781728189420
Identifier:	10.1109/radarconf2043947.2020.9266336
Identifier:	10.1109/radarconf2043947.2020.9266336
Additional Information:	© 2020 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.
Keywords:	Persistent Scatterers Interferometry (PSI), Transport Infrastructure Maintenance, Acquisition geometry, geo-statistical approach, Line of Sight (LoS)
Subjects:	Construction and engineering > Civil and environmental engineering Construction and engineering > Digital signal processing Construction and engineering > Electrical and electronic engineering Construction and engineering > Civil and structural engineering Construction and engineering
Related URLs:	https://www.radarconf20.org/
Depositing User:	Fabio Tosti
Date Deposited:	08 Jul 2020 17:14
Last Modified:	04 Nov 2024 12:47
URI:	https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/7170

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item

References

[1] A. Ferretti, C. Prati, F. Rocca, Permanent scatters in SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 39(1):8–20, 2001, https ://doi.org/10.1109/36.898661
[2] A. Ferretti, C. Prati, F. Rocca Nonlinear subsidence rate estimation using permanent scatterers in differential SAR interferometry. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 38(5):2202–2212, 2000. https ://doi.org/10.1109/36.86887 8
[3] A. Ferretti, C. Prati, F. Rocca Analysis of permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry. 132:1–3, 2000. https ://doi.org/10.1109/igars s.2000.861695
[4] A. Ferretti, A.Fumagalli, F.Novali, C.Prati, F. Rocca, A.Rucci, A new algorithm for processing interferometric data-stacks: SqueeSARTM. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2011.
[5] R. Lanari, O.Mora, M. Manunta, J.J. Mallorqui, P. Berardino, E Sansosti, A small baseline approach for investigating deformation on full resolution differential SAR interferograms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 42, 1377–1386, 2004.
[6] P. Berardino, G. Fornaro, R. Lanari, E. Sansosti, A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 40, 2375–2383, 2003.
[7] C. Colesanti, A. Ferretti, C. Prati et al., Monitoring landslides and tectonic motions with the Permanent Scatterers Technique. Eng Geol 68(1–2):3–14. https ://doi.org/10.1016/S0013 -7952(02)00195 -3,2003
[8] F. Koudogbo, A. Urdiroz, JG. Robles, G.Chapron, G.Lebon, V. Fluteaux, G. Priol Radar interferometry as an innovative solution for monitoring the construction of the Grand Paris Express metro network—first results. In: World tunnel conference, 2–25 April, Dubai, 2018
[9] F.D’Amico, V.Gagliardi, L.Bianchini Ciampoli, F.Tosti, Integration of InSAR and GPR Techniques for Monitoring Transition Areas in Railway Bridges. NDT&E International. (in press) 2020.
[10] L. Bianchini Ciampoli, V. Gagliardi, A.Calvi, F. D’Amico, F. Tosti, Automatic network-level bridge monitoring by integration of InSAR and GIS catalogues. (2019) Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering, 11059, . DOI: 10.1117/12.2527299
[11] A. M. Alani, F. Tosti, L. Bianchini Ciampoli, V.Gagliardi, A. Benedetto, Integration of GPR and InSAR methods for the health monitoring of masonry arch bridges. NDT&E International. 2020 (in press).
[12] Z. Yang, F. Schmid, C. Roberts, Assessment of railway performance by monitoring land subsidence. In: 6th IET conference on railway condition monitoring (RCM 2014), pp 1–6. https ://doi. org/10.1049/cp.2014.1000, 2014.
[13] L. Bianchini Ciampoli, V. Gagliardi, C. Clementini, D. Latini, F. Del Frate, A. Benedetto, Transport Infrastructure Monitoring by InSAR and GPR Data Fusion, Surveys in Geophysics, 1-24, 2019.
[14] G. Barla et al., InSAR monitoring of tunnel induced ground movements. Geomechanik und Tunnelbau 9(1):15–22, 2016. https ://doi.org/10.1002/geot.20150 0052
[15] F. Tosti, V. Gagliardi, F. D'Amico, A.M. Alani, Transport infrastructure monitoring by data fusion 720 of GPR and SAR imagery information. Transp Res Proc 2020; 45:771-778. 721 https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.02.097
[16] H.P. Sato, K.Abe, O. Ootaki, GPS-measured land subsidence in Ojiya City, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Eng. Geol., 67, 379–390, 2003.
[17] A. Mossop, P. Segall, Subsidence at The Geysers Geothermal Field, N. California from a comparison of GPS and leveling surveys. Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 1839–1842, 1997
[18] J. Olund, & J. DeWolf, (2007). Passive Structural Health Monitoring of Connecticut’s Bridge Infrastructure. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 13(4), 330–339. doi:10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2007)13:4(330
[19] P.Tang, D.Huber, & B. Akinci, Characterization of Laser Scanners and Algorithms for Detecting Flatness Defects on Concrete Surfaces. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 25(1), 31–42, 2011. doi:10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000073
[20] D.Notti, G. Herrera, S. Bianchini, C. Meisina, J.C. García-Davalillo, F. Zucca, A methodology for improving landslide PSI data analysis. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2014, 35, 2186–2214.
[21] A. Rosi, A.Agostini, V. Tofani, N. Casagli, A Procedure to Map Subsidence at the Regional Scale Using the Persistent Scatterer Interferometry (PSI) Technique. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 10510-10522.
[22] R.Giraldo, P. Delicado, & J. Mateu, Ordinary kriging for function-valued spatial data. Environ Ecol Stat 18, 411–426, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-010-0143-y
[23] A.Papritz, A. Stein, "Spatial prediction by linear kriging". Spatial Statistics for Remote Sensing. Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing. 1. p. 83. 2002. doi:10.1007/0-306-47647-9_6. ISBN 0-7923-5978-X.
[24] Sarmap. SARscape technical description, 2012. Internet resource accessed 2020-03-05 at:http://www.sarmap.ch/pdf/ /SARscapeTechnical.pdf

Tools

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

The University of West London

A novel geo-statistical approach for transport infrastructure network monitoring by persistent scatterer interferometry (PSI)

Abstract

Downloads

Actions (login required)

Menu