Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11‐year‐old schoolchildren's constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617-639.

Bagnoli, A., & Clark, A. (2010). Focus groups with young people: a participatory approach to research planning. Journal of youth studies, 13(1), 101-119.

Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Blustein, D. L. (2017). The psychology of working: A New Perspective for Career Development. Career Planning & Adult Development Journal, 33(2), 60-68.
Bourdieu, P. (1985). The market of symbolic goods. Poetics, 14(1-2), 13-44.

Bowen, G.A. (2005). Preparing a qualitative research-based dissertation: lessons learned. The Qualitative Report 10(2), 208 - 222.

Boychuk, C., Lysaght, R., & Stuart, H. (2018). Career Decision-Making Processes of Young Adults With First-Episode Psychosis. Qualitative health research, 28(6), 1016-1031.

Castelli, L., Carraro, L., Tomelleri, S., & Amari, A. (2007). White children's alignment to the perceived racial attitudes of the parents: Closer to the mother than the father. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25(3), 353-357.

Charmaz, K. (2013). Grounded theory methods in social justice research. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (eds), Strategies of qualitative inquiry, Thousand Oaks, US: Sage, pp291-336.

Charmaz, K., & Henwood, K. (2017). Grounded theory methods for qualitative psychology. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (eds), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, Palo Alto, US: Sage, pp. 238-260.

Charon, J.M. (2010). Symbolic Interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration Boston MA: Prentice Hall.

Cheryan, S., & Plaut, V. C. (2010). Explaining underrepresentation: A theory of precluded interest. Sex roles, 63(7-8), 475-488.

Christiansen, O. (2007). A simpler understanding of classic GT: How it is a fundamentally different methodology. The Grounded Theory Review, 6(3), 39-61.

Clark, R., & Lang A. (2002). Blanacing Yin and Yang: Teaching and Learning Qualitative Data Analysis within an Undergraduate Quantitative Analysis Course Teaching Sociology, 30(3), 343 - 360.
Cheryan, S,. Plaut, V.C., Handron, C. & Hudson, L. (2013). The stereotypical computer scientist: gendered media representations as a barrier to inclusion for women Sex Roles 69(1), 58 – 71.

Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and individual differences, 13(6), 653-665.

Crooks, D. L. (2001). The importance of symbolic interaction in grounded theory research on women’s health. Health Care For Women International, 22(1/2), 11-27.

Cutcliffe, J. R. (2003). Reconsidering reflexivity: Introducing the case for intellectual entrepreneurship. Qualitative health research, 13(1), 136-148.

Cutts, B, Hooley, T. and Yates, J. (2015) Fitting in or being yourself? How undergraduates plan to use hair, clothes and make-up to smooth their transition to the workplace. Industry and Higher Education, 29(4), 271-282.

Davis, L.E. (1996). Learning qualitative research: Electronic Learning Circles Qualitative Health Research 6(3), 453 – 357.

Ehrlinger, J., Plant, E. A., Hartwig, M. K., Vossen, J. J., Columb, C. J., & Brewer, L. E. (2018). Do Gender Differences in Perceived Prototypical Computer Scientists and Engineers Contribute to Gender Gaps in Computer Science and Engineering?. Sex roles, 78(1-2), 40-51.

Fernandez, C. (2012) Guest Editorial, Themed Section. The Grounded Theory Review, 11(1), 7 – 28.

Gadassi, R., & Gati, I. (2009). The effect of gender stereotypes on explicit and implicit career preferences. The Counseling Psychologist, 37(6), 902-922.

Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social problems, 12(4), 436-445.

Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Sociology Press.

Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis: Emergence vs forcing. Sociology Press.
Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.

Gottfredson, L.S. (1981). Circumscription and compromise: A developmental theory of occupational aspirations Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 545–579.

Gottfredson, L. S. (2002). Gottfredson’s theory of circumscription, compromise, and self-creation. In D. Brown (Ed.) Career choice and development (pp. 85-148). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gough, B., Fry, G., Grogan, S., & Conner, M. (2009). Why do young adult smokers continue to smoke despite the health risks? A focus group study. Psychology and Health, 24(2), 203-220.

Guichard, J. (2005). Life-long self-construction. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance, 5(2), 111-124.

Haley, J. (1990). Strategies of psychotherapy (2nd edn). Rockville, MD: Triangle Press. (Original work published 1963).

Hannover, B., & Kessels, U. (2004). Self-to-prototype matching as a strategy for making academic choices. Why high school students do not like math and science. Learning and instruction, 14(1), 51-67.

Haslam, S. A., & Wilson, A. (2000). In what sense are prejudicial beliefs personal? The importance of an in‐group's shared stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 45-63.

Hernandez, C. A. (2008). Are there two methods of grounded theory? Demystifying the methodological debate. The Grounded Theory Review, 7(2), 39-66.

HESA (2014). Graduate Destinations. Cheltenham: Higher Education Statistics Authority. Retrieved from https://www.hesa.ac.uk/data-and-analysis/students/destinations

Hilton, J. L., & von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review Of Psychology, 47(1), 237 - 271.

Holland J. (1959). A theory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6(1), 35 – 45.

Holton, J.A. (2007). The Coding Process and its Challenges. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds) The SAGE Handbook of Grounded Theory (pp.265 - 389). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.

Hussein, M. E., Hirst, S., Salyers, V., & Osuji, J. (2014). Using Grounded Theory as a Method of Inquiry: Advantages and Disadvantages. The Qualitative Report, 19(27), 1-15

Hyde, A., Howlett, E., Brady, D., & Drennan, J. (2005). The focus group method: Insights from focus group interviews on sexual health with adolescents. Social Science and Medicine, 61(12), 2588 - 2599.
Ibarra, H., & Barbulescu, R. (2010). Identity as narrative: Prevalence, effectiveness, and consequences of narrative identity work in macro work role transitions. Academy of management review, 35(1), 135-154.

Jung, J. Y., & Young, M. (2019). The occupational/career decision-making processes of intellectually gifted adolescents from economically disadvantaged backgrounds: A mixed methods perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly, 63(1), 36-57.

Jussim, L., Cain, T. R., Crawford, J. T., Harber, K., & Cohen, F. (2009). The unbearable accuracy of stereotypes. In, T.D. Nelson (Ed.), Handbook of prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination, (pp. 199-227). Hove: Psychology Press.

Kitzinger, J. (1994). The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of health & illness, 16(1), 103-121.

Koçoğlu, İ., Akgün, A. E., & Keskin, H. (2016). The Collective Unconscious at the Organizational Level: The Manifestation of Organizational Symbols. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235(24), 296-303.

Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 1994. Thousands Oak California: SAGE Publications Inc.

Lippmann W. (1991). Public opinion. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. Original work published 1922.

Lowe, A. (2005). Trust in emergence Keynote presentation delivered to the 3rd International qualitative Research convention University Teknologi, Malaysia.

MacKinnon, N. J., & Langford, T. (1994). The meaning of occupational prestige scores: A social psychological analysis and interpretation. The Sociological Quarterly, 35(2), 215-245.

Mastro, D. E., Behm‐Morawitz, E., & Kopacz, M. A. (2008). Exposure to television portrayals of Latinos: The implications of aversive racism and social identity theory. Human Communication Research, 34(1), 1-27.

McPherson, E., Park, B., & Ito, T. A. (2018). The Role of Prototype Matching in Science Pursuits: Perceptions of Scientists That Are Inaccurate and Diverge From Self-Perceptions Predict Reduced Interest in a Science Career. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(6), 881-898.

Meijers, F., & Lengelle, R. (2012). Narratives at work: The development of career identity. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 40(2), 157-176.

Myers, I. B. (1962). The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual. Palo Alto US: Consulting Psychologists Press.

O'Dowd, D. D., & Beardslee, D. C. (1967). Development and consistency of student images of occupations. Rochester, US: Michigan State University.
Packard, B. W. L., & Nguyen, D. (2003). Science career-related possible selves of adolescent girls: A longitudinal study. Journal of Career Development, 29(4), 251-263.
Peters, K., Ryan, M, Haslam, S.A. & Fernandes, H. (2012). To belong or not to belong: evidence that women’s occupational disidentification is promoted by lack of fit with masculine occupational prototypes, Journal of Personnel Psychology 11(3), 148 – 158.

Pisarik, C. T., Rowell, P. C., & Currie, L. K. (2013). Work-related daydreams: A qualitative content analysis. Journal of Career Development, 40(2), 87-106.

Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. (1997). Organisational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 862-898.

Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. (2001).Symbols as a language of organizational relationships. Research in Organizational Behavior, 23, 93-132.

Ramarajan, L., & Reid, E. (2013). Shattering the myth of separate worlds: negotiating nonwork identities at work. Academy Of Management Review, 38(4), 621-644.

Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive psychology, 7(4), 573-605.

Ryan, M. (2014). Who is Like a Scientist? A Self-Prototype Matching Approach to Women's Underrepresentation in STEM Fields (Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington).

Savickas, M. L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In S.D. Brown & R.W. Lent (eds) Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work, (2nd edition) pp144-180. Wiley.

Savickas, M.L. (2015). Career counseling paradigms: Guiding, developing, and designing. In P. J. Hartung, M. L. Savickas and B. W. Walsh (Eds), APA handbook of career intervention (pp. 129-143). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

Savickas, M. L., & Hartung, P. J. (2012). My career story. An autobiographical workbook for life-career success. Presentation at the annual meeting of the National Career Development Association.

Savickas, M. L., Nota, L., Rossier, J., Dauwalder, J. P., Duarte, M. E., Guichard, J., ... & Van Vianen, A. E. (2009). Life designing: A paradigm for career construction in the 21st century. Journal of vocational behavior, 75(3), 239-250.

Schneider, D. J. (2004). The psychology of stereotyping. New York: Guilford Press.

Schreiber, R.S. (2001). The “How To” of Grounded Theory, Avoiding the Pitfalls. In R.S. Schreider, & P.N. Stern (eds), Using grounded theory in nursing. Philadelphia, US: Springer.

Sherriff, N., Gugglberger, L., Hall, C. and Scholes, J. (2014). “From start to finish”: practical and ethical considerations in the use of focus groups to evaluate sexual health services interventions for young people. Qualitative Psychology 1(2), 92 – 106.

Sim, J. (1998). Collecting and analysing qualitative data: issues raised by the focus group. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(2), 346 - 352.

Starr, C. R. (2018). “I’m Not a Science Nerd!” STEM Stereotypes, Identity, and Motivation Among Undergraduate Women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 489-503.

Strati, A. (1998). Organizational symbolism as a social construction: A perspective from the sociology of knowledge. Human Relations, 51(11), 1379-1402.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research – Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Strauss, K., Griffin, M. A., & Parker, S. K. (2012). Future work selves: How salient hoped-for identities motivate proactive career behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 580 - 598.

Tolich, M. (2009). The principle of caveat emptor: confidentiality and informed consent as endemic ethical dilemmas in focus group research. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 6(1), 99 - 108.

Wade, P., Bergeron, C., White, K., Teeman, D., Sims, D. & Mehta, P. (2010). Key Stage 2 Career-Related Learning Pathfinder Evaluation. London: Department for Education.

Warr, D. J. (2005). “It was fun... but we don’t usually talk about these things”: analyzing sociable interaction in focus groups. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(2), 200-225.

Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Yates, J. (2017). A meta-theoretical framework for career practitioners. The Indian Journal of Career and Livelihood Planning, 5(1), 15-25.

Yates, J. & Cahill, S. (2018). What kind of shoes does a social worker wear? A content analysis of four occupational prototypes. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. Online first 10.1080/03069885.2018.1437596