GPR applications in structural detailing of a major tunnel using different frequency antenna systems

Alani, Amir and Tosti, Fabio ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0291-9937 (2018) GPR applications in structural detailing of a major tunnel using different frequency antenna systems. Construction and Building Materials, 158. pp. 1111-1122. ISSN 0950-0618

Preview

PDF
Alani & Tosti C&B Mat_Revised.pdf - Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.
Download (1MB) | Preview

Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.100

Abstract

This paper reports an extended study on the applications of ground penetrating radar (GPR) on the structural detailing of a major tunnel located under the River Medway in north Kent, United Kingdom (the Medway Tunnel). Construction of the tunnel was completed in 1996 and it carries a substantial volume of traffic between two major areas of Medway in the south east of England. The construction of the tunnel is an “immersed tube” tunnel type that connects a number of segments at immersion joint points. This investigation reports the utilisation of two sets of antenna systems with different frequencies (900MHz and 2GHz GPR) in establishing structural details of the tunnel roof at immersion joints. The processed data compiled as a result of this investigation provided essential information to tunnel engineers for forthcoming maintenance planning purposes. The data also provided ample information confirming rather doubted construction design drawings/plans originally produced. The results obtained were conclusive in terms of construction materials and structural design configurations (shape and dimensions) as well as the identification of rebar positions at all three immersion joint locations. A comparison between the different frequency antenna sets provided invaluable information in confirming the above findings. This paper also provides useful information within the context of survey planning and site procedure in a complex operation in terms of adaptation of the GPR systems used.

Item Type:	Article
Identifier:	10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.100
Additional Information:	© 2017 Elsevier. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords:	Tunnel lining; Health monitoring and assessment; Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR); Data interpretation
Subjects:	Construction and engineering > Civil and environmental engineering Construction and engineering > Digital signal processing Construction and engineering > Electrical and electronic engineering Construction and engineering > Civil and structural engineering Construction and engineering
Related URLs:	Publisher
Depositing User:	Fabio Tosti
Date Deposited:	18 Sep 2017 10:41
Last Modified:	28 Aug 2021 07:24
URI:	https://repository.uwl.ac.uk/id/eprint/3920

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

Actions (login required)

View Item

References

[1] ITA/AITES, Settlements induced by tunneling in soft ground, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 22 (2007) 119–149.
[2] ITA/AITES, Report on the damaging effects of water on tunnels during their working life, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 6 (1) (1991).
[3] L. Topczewski, F.M. Fernandes, P.J.S. Cruz, P.B. Lourenço, Verifying design plans and detecting deficiencies in concrete bridge using GPR, in Proc. of IABMAS’06, 3rd International Conference on Bridge Maintenance Safety and Management, Porto, Portugal, 2006.
[4] A.M. Alani, K. Banks, (2014), Applications of ground penetrating radar in Medway Tunnel – inspection of structural joints, in Proc. of the 15th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR 2014), Brussels, Belgium, Jun.-July 2014.
[5] J. White, S. Hurlebaus, P. Shokouhi, A. Wimsatt (2015), Nondestructive Testing Methods for Underwater Tunnel Linings: Practical application at Chesapeake channel tunnel, in Proc. of the International Symposium Non-Destructive Testing in Civil Engineering (NDT-CE), Berlin, Germany, Sept. 15–17, 2015.
[6] F. Lehmann, (2015). Practical application of non-destructive test methods at a single-shell tunnel lining, In Proc. of the 7th fib PhD Symposium in Stuttgart, Germany Sept. 11–13, 2008.
[7] A.G. Davis, M.K. Lim, C.G. Petersen, Rapid and economical evaluation of concrete tunnel linings with impulse response and impulse radar non-destructive methods, NDT & E Int., 38 (3) (2005) 181–186.
[8] O. Abraham, X. Dérobert, Non-destructive testing of fired tunnel walls: the Mont-Blanc Tunnel case study, NDT&E Int. 36 (2003) 411–418.
[9] E. Cardarelli, C. Marrone, L. Orlando, Evaluation of tunnel stability using integrated geophysical methods, J. Appl. Geophys., 52 (2003) 93–102.
[10] J. Hugenschmidt, Concrete bridge inspection with a mobile GPR system, Constr. Build. Mater., 16 (3) (2002) 147–154.
[11] H.-z. Yu, Y.-f. Ouyang, H. Chen, (2012), Application of Ground Penetrating Radar to Inspect the Metro Tunnel, In Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), June 4-8, Shanghai, China.
[12] A.M. Alani, M. Aboutalebi, G. Kilic, (2013) Applications of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) in Bridge Deck Monitoring and Assessment, J. Appl. Geophys. 97 (2013) 45–54.
[13] F. Zhanga, X. Xie, H. Huang, (2010), Application of ground penetrating radar in grouting evaluation for shield tunnel construction, Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech. 25 (2010) 99–107.
[14] M-j Li, Y.-g. Zhao, H. Liu, Z. Wan, J.-c. Xu, X.-p. Xu, Y. Chen, W. Bin, Layer recognition and thickness evaluation of tunnel lining based on ground penetrating radar measurements, J. Appl. Geophys. 73(1) (2011) 45–48.
[15] L. Xiang, H.-l. Zhou, Z. Shu, S.-h.Tan, G.-q. Liang, J. Zhu, GPR evaluation of the Damaoshan highway tunnel: A case study, NDT&E Int. 59 (2013) 68–76.
[16] Q.-m. Yu, H.-l. Zhou, Y.-h. Wang, R.-x. Duan, Quality monitoring of metro grouting behind segment using ground penetrating radar, Constr. Build. Mater. 110 (2016) 189–200.
[17] X. Xie, C. Zeng, Non-destructive evaluation of shield tunnel condition using GPR and 3D laser scanning, in Proc. of the 14th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), June 4-8, Shanghai, China, 2012.
[18] A. Wimsatt, J. White, C. Leung, T. Scullion, S. Hurlebaus, D. Zollinger, Z. Grasley, S. Nazarian, H. Azari, D. Yuan, P. Shokouhi, T. Saarenketo, Mapping voids, debonding, delaminations, moisture, and other defects behind or within tunnel linings. SHRP 2 Project R06-G, Prepublication draft. The second strategic highway research program 2, Washington, D.C.: Transportation Research Board of the National Academies; 2013.
[19] A. Benedetto, F. Benedetto, Remote sensing of soil moisture content by GPR signal processing in the frequency domain, IEEE Sensors J. 11 (10) (2011) 2432–2441.
[20] Z.-l. Huang, J. Zhang, Determination of parameters of subsurface layers using GPR spectral inversion method, IEEE T. Geosci.Remote 52 (12) (2014) 7527–7533.
[21] N.J. Cassidy, Electrical and magnetic properties of rocks, soils and fluids, in “Ground Penetrating Radar Theory and Applications” Ed. Jol, 41-72, 2008.
[22] S. Tillard, J.C. Dubois, Analysis of GPR data: wave propagation velocity determination, J. Appl. Geophys. 33 (1995) 77–91.
[23] S. Shihab, W. Al-Nuaimy, A. Eriksen. Radius estimation for subsurface cylindrical objects detected by ground penetrating radar. In Proc. of the 10th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Delft, The Netherlands, 2004 pp. 319-322.
[24] G. Borgioli, L. Capineri, P. Falorni, S. Matucci, C. Windsor, The detection of buried pipes from time-of-flight radar data, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote 46 (2008) 2254–2266.
[25] G. Olhoeft, Maximizing the information return from ground penetrating radar, J. Appl. Geophys. 43 (2000) 175–187.
[26] A. Dolgiy, A. Dolgiy, V. Zolotarev, 2006. Optimal radius estimation for subsurface pipes detected by ground penetrating radar. In Proc. of the 11th International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
[27] A. Ristic, D. Petrovacki, M. Govedarica, A new method to simultaneously estimate the radius of a cylindrical object and the wave propagation velocity from GPR data, Comput. Geosci. 35(8) (2009) 1620–1630.
[28] S. Shihab, W. Al-Nuaimy, Radius estimation for cylindrical objects detected by ground penetrating radar, Subsurf. Sens. Techn. Appl. 6 (2005) 151–166.
[29] G. Manacorda, A. Simi, M. Miniati, Mapping underground assets with fully innovative gpr hardware and software tools, In Proc. of The North American Society (NASTT) and the International Society for Trenchless Technology (ISTT) International No-Dig Show 2009, Toronto, Ontario Canada March 29 – April 3, 2009
[30] A.M. Alani, Method Statement and Risk Assessment document entitled: Medway Tunnel GPR and Laser Scanner Risk Assessment, Technical Report, 2014.
[31] G.R. Olhoeft, Maximizing the information return from ground penetrating radar, J. Appl. Geophys. 43 (2–4) (2000) 175–187.
[32] R. Yelf, D. Yelf, Where is true time zero? Electromagn. Phenom. 7 1 (18) (2006) 159–163.
[33] A. Benedetto, F. Tosti, L. Bianchini Ciampoli, F. D’Amico, (2016). An overview of ground-penetrating radar signal processing techniques for road inspections, Signal Process 132 (2017) 201-209.
[34] H. Jol, Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009.
[35] S. Xie, Y. Yang, G. Hou, J. Wang, Z. Ji, (2016). Development of layer structured wave absorbing mineral wool boards for indoor electromagnetic radiation protection, Journal of Building Engineering, 5, 79-85.

Tools

CORE (COnnecting REpositories)

The University of West London

GPR applications in structural detailing of a major tunnel using different frequency antenna systems

Abstract

Downloads

Actions (login required)

Menu