Tobutt, Clive and Milani, Raffaella (2010) Comparing two counselling styles for hazardous drinkers charged with alcohol-related offences in a police custody suite: piloting motivational interviewing brief intervention or a standard brief intervention to reduce alcohol consumption. Advances in Dual Diagnosis.
Clive Milani MI.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only
The aim of this randomised intervention study was to test the use of two counselling styles in reducing alcohol
consumption in offenders who were hazardous drinkers and who had been charged with alcohol-related
offences. An additional aim was to evaluate the research process itself before embarking on a larger trial.
Participants were recruited from a police custody suite in the south east of England and randomised to receive
either a motivational interviewing brief intervention (MIBI) or a standard brief intervention (BI). The Alcohol Use
Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) was used to screen offenders for hazardous drinking. Participants were
asked to complete a second AUDIT 12 weeks later. Two hundred offenders with alcohol-related offences were screened over a 10-month period. Of these, 182 were alcohol dependent and were therefore excluded from the study. Of the 18 who were eligible to enter the study, six refused to participate. Five were randomised to the MIBI group and seven into the BI group (BI). The mean age of the MIBI group was 25 (SD±3.86) years and the mean age of the BI group was 32.4 (SD±7.9). Audit scores were significantly lower at time 2 compared to time 1 for both intervention groups (t(11) = 17.60; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the different intervention groups.
|Subjects:||Medicine and health > Mental health
Psychology > Substance abuse/misuse
|Depositing User:||Raffaella Milani|
|Date Deposited:||12 May 2016 16:13|
|Last Modified:||14 Nov 2016 10:29|
Actions (login required)