Dowd, Garin (2008) Prolegomena to a critique of excavatory reason: reply to Matthew Feldman. Samuel Beckett Today/Aujourd'hui, 20. pp. 375-388. ISSN 9789062025141Full text not available from this repository.
This essay is a reply to Matthew Feldman's identification and advocacy (in SBT/A 16) of a methodological "partition" in Beckett studies. It argues that the 'critical tribunal' set up by his article may be contested on the grounds that: the advocated paradigm for research makes a contentious journey from science to literature; it dogmatically imposes restrictions on the range of literary critical interventions deemed to be of value; it employs a 'black box' approach to its own argument.
|Depositing User:||Garin Dowd|
|Date Deposited:||14 Nov 2014 11:24|
|Last Modified:||10 Nov 2016 12:34|
Actions (login required)